A Conversation for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]

42ism

Post 1

Rosemary {[(2+2+2)^2]+4+2=42}

Mine goes round with me as part of my user name {[(2+2+2)^2]+4+2=42}
2+2+2=6
6X6 {also expressed as 6^2} =36
36+4=40
40+2=42


42ism

Post 2

The Mayan Templar

I have two

the first one uses the {6 x 9 = 42} rule

(2*0+9)*(2*0+6)=42

and the second traditional one

(2*0+sqrt(9))*(20-6) = 42

smiley - biggrin


42ism

Post 3

Potholer

Excellent.
If you want a traditional solution without the sqrt, my program suggests
(2+0)*9*2+0+6
or
2*0+(9-2)*(0+6)


42ism

Post 4

illaveaguinness

I am quite impressed at the effort that everyone has gone to in order to find all of the mathematical methods of producing the number 42 (Fourty two) however .. as you are all aware the question to the ultimate answer of life the universe and everything is "what do you get if you multiply six by nine" (as pulled out of the scrabble bagon pre-historic earth) ... well the answer to that one is 54 ... in our standard decimal counting system (or base 10) .. however there are several other counting systems such as binary where 42 is equal to 101010 ... or Hex (base 16) where 42 = 2A ... It just so happens that 6*9 in base 13 is 42 (four two) i.e. 4*13 = 52 with two remaining .... 42 ...

.... so who's up for the challenge ! Interstella travel beckons .. you just have to do the math's slightly differently !


42ism

Post 5

Rod, Keeper of Pointless and/or funny discussions or statements

whohooo! found mine!!! my evening is wonderfull againsmiley - biggrinsmiley - smiley

smiley - cheerup
wait, must remember to post it...

-1* sprt(9)+ 0*1+ 9*5 = 42

Rod


42ism

Post 6

Potholer

Excellent smiley - ok

Yours is actually a pretty tough number - having multiple 1s,0s and 9s does generally make things quite hard. Most U-numbers have multiple solutions just using +-* and /, but for yours, my (not-quite-perfect) solver program could only come up with

1-9+0+(1+9)*5
(effectively 50-9+1), which in essence is largely the same form as your solution (45-3). smiley - smiley


42ism

Post 7

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

NO SQRTs!!!!

sorry ...

Apart from that well done...

Unless someone has changed the page I'm pretty sure it says about NO SQUARE ROOTS, oh and the two types of 42ism - the DNA Stylee and the "regular" stylee...


42ism

Post 8

Rod, Keeper of Pointless and/or funny discussions or statements

regarding square roots the page actualy sais:
>sqrt - Square Root (prefence not to use this)

so it's not forbidden, just a preference. And besides, if you look at the examples given on the page there are a few amongst those with square roots.
And can you tell me what the difference between using a square root and 'to the power (^) is (except for the part of getting strange decimale numbers most of the time...)

Rod


42ism

Post 9

Potholer

I suppose it could be argued that sqrt is like using ^(1/2), but without needing to have the 1 and the 2 present.
I can see the point having it as 'best avoided', since generally it's just a quick digit-switcher (9->3, 4->2), but that really puts it at worst on a par with sin, cos and ! used for 0<->1 conversions.


42ism

Post 10

another primate (called rik)

So is there a preference for simpler solutions or over the top ones?

from 1372176: 1+3-7+2+1+(7*6)=42, although it did seem like a bit of a cheat with the whole 7*6 and cancelling out thing. I also got it really quickly, and as I was trying to engage in a serious session of procrastination at the time it just wouldn't do for my purposes! So, I went a bit silly and came up with:

1*((3!)^((-7+2^1)+7))+6 =42

Is either considered a "purer" form of 42ism?!



42ism

Post 11

Potholer

I think there's an aesthetic preference, possibly rather more common among the people who can manage to find a simpler solution for their own number.

I suppose the simplest answers are no-bracket solutions using just + and -, since they can be simply read from left to right without the implicit parentheses involved with * and -.
That said, 13+7+21+7-6 or 1+37+2+1+7-6 aren't really much different to 1+3-7+2+1+7*6, it's just that solutions simply using + and - are all going to be expressible without brackets, whereas many * or / solutions will use brackets

I'm 9+25+8+0, so maybe I'm biased.


42ism

Post 12

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

Ahem, sorry to shout, but stuff like ^ (to the power of) is fine as you have to include another number for it to make sense...

I s'pose you could follow the argument further and say that ! (Factorial), Sin, cos, etc... Are all invalid as is sqrt - but that'd be silly (when has that every stopped me)...

However the main reason for "outlawing" sqrt is to do with other possiblities - if you allow sqrt you should then allow cubed root, Squared, Cubed, etc....


Key: Complain about this post