A Conversation for Freedom of communication
review
xyroth Started conversation Apr 4, 2001
Perhaps the first paragraph can have the list seperated, going something like this:
Everyone should have the following rights, and any medium of communication can be judged by how well these rights are upheld.
1, the right to be heard by everyone who wants to hear them.
2, the right to hear anyone who wants to be heard by them.
3, everyone has the right to not be heard by anyone they wish
4, the right to not hear anyone they wish.
perhaps that would read better. 
review
NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) Posted Apr 4, 2001
Thanks!
review
xyroth Posted Apr 4, 2001
I still think it should be "should have" rather than "has" rights.
ps how about extending the article?
review
NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) Posted Apr 4, 2001
I'm working on it, and I do believe that everyone has (not should have) these rights.
review
xyroth Posted Apr 4, 2001
In an ideal world, I would agree that everyone should be in the position of having those rights, but I think that this world is a long was from that point. As you have framed it as the individual having rights, how about a bit about what responsibilities go with using those rights?
Key: Complain about this post
review
More Conversations for Freedom of communication
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."