A Conversation for Freedom of communication

number three

Post 1

kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013

I don't understand number three, although it is the one you say most people insist on having.

>the right to not be heard by anyone they wish

So that means the right to say what you want and to exclude certain people from hearing it? Isn't that really a privacy rather than freedom of speech issue? Or are you refering to secrecy where for example a government doesn't want the people to hear about certain aspects of their policy?

Let me know if I am being blonde again, I haven't had my smiley - cappuccino yet this morning.


number three

Post 2

NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.)

Digging through my old conversations, and found this. #3 would be freedom to communicate privately, that is, freedom from eavesdropping.


number three

Post 3

NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.)

I probably need to update this article, now that I think about it.


number three

Post 4

kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013

Ah, I see what you were getting at now, I was being a bit blonde but it could probably do with a bit of expanding! smiley - ok

It is always spooky when a very old comment pops up like that, it always makes me think I talk too much about things I know nothing about...!

smiley - puffk


number three

Post 5

NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.)

I'll keep that in mind. smiley - winkeye


Key: Complain about this post