A Conversation for The European Convention on Human Rights

A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 1

RedFish ><>

There is an entry on the Universal declaration but there doesnt seem to be one on the european convention so here is one.

A407116

---The Red Fish


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 2

RedFish ><>

I wouldnt complain if someone were to go there and comment.
Or is it too boring a subject?

---RedFish


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 3

Martin Harper

good entry, but I think it could do with some of the political background. One of the complaints levelled at the court is that it is too political, and often rules so as to increase it's own power. Another is that it destroys national sovereignty. Some comment on this more interesting side would be good, I think, and help to stir up debate...


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 4

RedFish ><>

good points, thanks smiley - smiley

smiley - fish

---RedFish


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 5

Amy the Ant - High Manzanilla of the Church of the Stuffed Olive

Short but to the point. I like it. smiley - smiley

Perhaps now would be a good time to run it through a spell check.

smiley - bigeyes

Amy the (scout) Ant


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 6

RedFish ><>

Hmmm... spellng? Well I never, what are editors for then? smiley - smiley

Okay, willcheck, at some point


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 7

RedFish ><>

I have run it through the microsoft word spellchecker so its probably worse than it was before smiley - winkeye I will now wait and hope for it to be approved...


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 8

amdsweb

Hi.
Looks groovy to me. I can't comment on the content too much, as I try to avoid politics as much as possible, but I found it very informative and concise. One nit-picky point: the green writing doesn't come out very well on the classic goo background.

- Adam


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 9

Crescent

I am pretty sure most of the stuff that makes it so pretty will be ripped out when it is edited smiley - sadface It is good, but I would like to actually read the convention, know the exceptions, that sort of thing. Do you have it, can you put it in? Until later......
BCNU - Crescent


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 10

RedFish ><>

Yeah, I do have it in bookelt form, I suppose I _could_ type it all up and put it in, but the idea of the article was to provide an overview of the document. Do you think I should put what I already have as an introduction and then put the full convention afterwards?


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 11

Crescent

It is up to you, but it does sound like a good idea. Or maybe have this called An Introduction to The European Convention on Human Rights, and then write another Entry called The European Convention of Human Rights, which has the text in it smiley - smiley But as I say, it is up to you smiley - smiley Hope this helps. Until later....
BCNU - Crescent


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 12

RedFish ><>

good idea! I will give it some thought


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 13

Amy the Ant - High Manzanilla of the Church of the Stuffed Olive

Isn't there going to be a copyright problem with including a substantial part of the text of the booklet? I think it's fine as it is.


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 14

Crescent

I am not sure about the European Convention, but the Universal Decleration actually said (paraphrasing) 'this is to be spread as far as poss.' And how can something like this be copywritable? Any interpretations taken from the booklet, yes, but the actual Convention Article itself, I wouldn't of thought so. And if it is, then there is something majorly wrong here......
BCNU - Crescent


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 15

Amy the Ant - High Manzanilla of the Church of the Stuffed Olive

If the authors intended that to mean that it should be available online then it will already be there on an official site and will only need a link.


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 16

RedFish ><>

Amy, you are probably right about copyright, I dont think we ought to risk h2g2 being sued by the European Commission... there _is_ an official website, i think its coe.eu but i will check


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 17

RedFish ><>

okay, the convention URL (english version):

http://conventions.coe.int/treaty/en/WhatYouWant.asp?NT=005

The official council of europe website:

http://www.coe.int


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 18

amdsweb

I think that linking to those sites from the article would be fine, and would certainly save your fingers from typing out the booklet smiley - smiley


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 19

RedFish ><>

I will put the link to the convention in now....

Thanks for all the input smiley - smiley


A407116, the European Convention of Human Rights

Post 20

RedFish ><>

Its done... any more ideas? smiley - tongueout


Key: Complain about this post