A Conversation for Happy Tom Parker

Peer Review: A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 1

David Parker

Entry: Happy Tom Parker - A32381705
Author: dulcimer_dave - U9474987

As it is at the moment with the information I have this is complete. Is it still possible to edit if it is selected as a guide entry?


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 2

lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned


Welcome back into PR smiley - biggrin


You will now continue with the process of polishing up your entry until it's deemed suitable for selection for sub-editing (after a minimum of 7 days in PR).

While here, you have control of editing your entry smiley - ok


lil x


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 3

bobstafford

Hi dulcimer_dave nice to meet you,

Peer review will do a fair bit of the editing, then if it is chosen the subeditor will give ite entry the final polish.

This is a nice entry very well done

If I may I think this paragraph
Thomas Parker was born in around 1808. His mother was Brigit Parker, formerly Brigit Perry, he was born in Bury St Edmunds. Somewhere between 1842 and 1845 he met his wife, Susanna Elizabeth Hodges

Would read better as
Thomas Parker was born in Bury St Edmunds around 1808, his mother was Brigit Parker, formerly Brigit Perry. Somewhere between 1842 and 1845 he met his wife, Susanna Elizabeth Hodges.

Thats all I can spot and so a fine entry smiley - applause



Bob

smiley - smiley


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 4

David Parker

Thanks for that. My Dad was born in Maidstone, in Hardy street, near the prison. I think that makes him also a Man of Kent.


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 5

Gnomon - time to move on

smiley - book


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 6

Gnomon - time to move on

Thatnks for writing this. I've never heard of Happy Tom Parker before, so I look forward to learning about him.

The introduction section should talk about Tom, who he was, roughly when he lived and what he did, all in a few lines. This should be an overview, and interesting enough to grab the reader's attention and make him read on. It should start by talking about someone else, William Parker, because the entry isn't about William, it's about Tom.

Since you have chosen to put this into GuideML, there's quite a bit of tidy that can be done on it to make it look better, but this isn't too important. The important thing is to get the content right so that it grabs the reader and makes them read it.


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 7

Malabarista - now with added pony

Do avoid all-caps, though, it looks like shouting smiley - headhurts


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 8

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Author last posted 22 Dec 08.

Propose move to Flea Market.

GB
Scout


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 9

lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned


Seconded smiley - ok


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 10

The H2G2 Editors

Apologies, on reflection this was moved from Peer Review a tad too soon. We've put the Entry back into Peer Review now so please continue the conversation here:
F48874?thread=6299686

Many thanks.


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 11

Gnomon - time to move on

Other recommendations to the author of this: there's a bit of repetition, and a tad too much detail of censuses and so on. Try and concentrate a bit more on what Parker did, rather than who he was related to. For example, you mention his billing in the same show as Houdini. Can you find what it actually said on the poster?


A32381705 - Happy Tom Parker

Post 12

David Parker

I hope I have removed some of the repetition and also I have been given some suggestions as to where I may be able to go to fill in some detail between 1913 and 1944.


Key: Complain about this post