A Conversation for LIL'S ATELIER
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
U195408 Posted Feb 16, 2004
or, in decimal: 785557542586
But I still don't get what it means.
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
U195408 Posted Feb 16, 2004
actually, I take it back. It's probably 802,455,211,738 in decimal. Still a very large number.
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
nadia Posted Feb 16, 2004
I don't suppose catnip would help stop my cat mousing. She brought a live one in last night and it ran into a printer! We had ever so much fun getting it back out again. It's a tempting idea to keep her drugged.
N
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
Asteroid Lil - Offstage Presence Posted Feb 16, 2004
Kaz, welome to the atelier! I see the others have made you comfortable, apart from the badgers, but I'll additionally point you to A304354 , our forum page, which in turn has an offsite link to the floorplan and some backstory.
I haven't raised a new topic because conversation threads normally run to about a thousand or twelve hundred posts. Recent aberrations were due to our being flooded, but we think that episode is behind us now.
Anyway, as it gets close to the end of the thread the salonistas get restless and constantly go off-topic, and check their running shoes for the FTTF race (which won't be till the end of the week ). Marv, you can send me notes on Wednesday.
In addition to evening classes to prep for, this is local politics week, with te County Commissioners meeting tomorrow and our Preservation Board meeting Thursday night.
And there's trouble in Dodge. The two big landowners are circulating a petition to have the B district secede from the Ordinance. The real reason for this is that they want to make money off their overgrazed sections by selling out to developers, but they're going uner the umbrella of "property rights".
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
Coniraya Posted Feb 16, 2004
I don't like developers , except that a friend's husband is one, but at least he isn't part of the mob trying to foist 14 houses on us.
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
FG Posted Feb 16, 2004
Honestly, I think "real estate developer" is becoming the new bad guy in many circles, from Hollywood movies to local elections. I know around here those are fightin' words said with a distinct tone akin to discussing a child molester.
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
Mrs Zen Posted Feb 16, 2004
Lil's comments about property prompt me to ask for opinions on a decision facing me. I have minimal pension provision, and like a lot of UKians I am using the high value of property to increase my net worth, in the hope that I will have enough capital when I retire to cover my ass.
I would love to live in one of the villages, but even the smallest cottages are a quarter of a mil sterling, which is way more than I can afford even with a mortgage. However there is a village locally with rather an odd history: it was built a hundred years ago on land which was bought communally. The deeds to the land were burned, and the houses on the land are therefore neither freehold nor leasehold. What you buy is the building, and the colony (ie community) grant you use of your patch of land. Because there are no deeds the building is un-mortgagable, and you have to pay cash. As a result the properties are very cheap, and I could probably get together enough cash to buy one. I would rent out my flat and use the rent to pay part of the mortgage on the flat, though I would have to subsidise the rest. But I would have no mortgage on the place where I lived. When I come to sell the property in the village it will not have had the capital gain that a similar property in another village would have had, but on the other hand I will have had the pleasure of living there.
So - should I do this, or should I stick to more traditional (and expensive and rewarding) forms of property? Pleasure now, or money later?
Ben
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
Bald Bloke Posted Feb 16, 2004
Ok I admit I may be slightly cynical.....
But the Quiz: Are you a cynic at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3492709.stm
tells me
Your results...
You're a top grade grade cynic - in fact you've turned cynicism into an art form. you greet almost every piece of news with sneering contempt.
Loosen up a bit.
Am I right to be just a bit cynical about the result?
[BB]
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
Montana Redhead (now with letters) Posted Feb 16, 2004
I'm a second-rate cynic (makes me feel rather like I failed the test, actually).
The boys are off to the vet today to get snipped. I'm looking forward to an evening free of toe-biting and cat racing.
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
logicus tracticus philosophicus Posted Feb 16, 2004
BEN i think you will find the goverment is allready adrressing that
"loophole" or "liscence to print money" in both "leasehold freehold"
reform acts over last couple of years ,try doing a land resgistry search, with regard to this "village" this will aid your "descision makeing progrees"
http://www.landreg.gov.uk/
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
azahar Posted Feb 16, 2004
The badgers reminded me of this site, though not sure if it's ear-worm material:
http://www.rathergood.com/independent_woman/
az
(apparently top grade cynic - yeah right)
Key: Complain about this post
67Xth Conversation at the Atelier
- 941: Kaz (Feb 16, 2004)
- 942: Hati (Feb 16, 2004)
- 943: Gw7en, Voice of Chaos (Classic) (Feb 16, 2004)
- 944: SE (Feb 16, 2004)
- 945: U195408 (Feb 16, 2004)
- 946: U195408 (Feb 16, 2004)
- 947: Gw7en, Voice of Chaos (Classic) (Feb 16, 2004)
- 948: logicus tracticus philosophicus (Feb 16, 2004)
- 949: nadia (Feb 16, 2004)
- 950: Asteroid Lil - Offstage Presence (Feb 16, 2004)
- 951: logicus tracticus philosophicus (Feb 16, 2004)
- 952: Coniraya (Feb 16, 2004)
- 953: FG (Feb 16, 2004)
- 954: Mrs Zen (Feb 16, 2004)
- 955: azahar (Feb 16, 2004)
- 956: Bald Bloke (Feb 16, 2004)
- 957: Kaz (Feb 16, 2004)
- 958: Montana Redhead (now with letters) (Feb 16, 2004)
- 959: logicus tracticus philosophicus (Feb 16, 2004)
- 960: azahar (Feb 16, 2004)
More Conversations for LIL'S ATELIER
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."