A Conversation for English Usage in the Edited Guide

Possessive apostrophes

Post 1

Pimms

In my role as a pedant I occasionally point out where a possessive apostrophe has been missed out, or other minor typo.

Following one such suggested amendation (F129614?thread=304765 ) I was directed to view this style guide, with the implication that it would suggest that such apostrophes are not part of the EG style. In particular "Just to see what is right and wrong for the Edited Guide. Check the fifth bullet point of 'Grammar and Punctuation'."

This is a particular case for the word 'its' - might I suggest that the ambiguity that allows this misinterpetation is clarified eg "Possessive apostrophes should always be used, except in the case of 'its'"

This should be pretty obvious without being stated explicitly, as possessive apostrophes are used on several occasions in the style guide, but I don't think it would hurt to mention it and avoid confusion.

Pimmsaloonie smiley - winkeye


Possessive apostrophes

Post 2

The H2G2 Editors

Could you just explain in simple terms what it is you want us to do, please Pimms? It's not entirely clear smiley - smiley

- rewrite the guidelines?

- rewrite English grammar?

- correct a specific entry?

- something else?


Possessive apostrophes

Post 3

Gordon, Ringer of Bells, Keeper of Postal Codes and Maps No One Can Re-fold Properly

I think he'd like someone to go through A1095996 and fix the possessives. smiley - winkeye

Cheers!

smiley - teasmiley - towel


Possessive apostrophes

Post 4

Kerr_Avon - hunting stray apostrophes and gutting poorly parsed sentences

I think he means replacing the specific bit about its/it's, with a sentence along the lines of the one he suggested. I wouldsuggest both- make the position on possesives clear, but also note its/it's.

smiley - ale


Possessive apostrophes

Post 5

Pimms

Sorry it wasn't crystal clear.

I would like the Sub-Ed guidelines amended to clarify that:

- what is mentioned in relation to 'its' is a *special* case where the normal rules for using possessive apostrophes is not followed, rather than a blanket ban on possessive apostrophes.smiley - ok

and yes I'd also like the apostrophes put back into the front page entry on Gravity and Inertia.smiley - smiley

Pimmsaloonie smiley - winkeye


Possessive apostrophes

Post 6

The H2G2 Editors

When we came to look at this, it still wasn't clear what the query was here, unfortunately, as we were under the impression that we'd not requested a blanket ban on possessives. Having read the discussion in the linked thread, however, we could see that there might be room for confusion. This has now been addressed in the Guidelines.

We were also surprised that the apostrophes were removed from the entry you cited, and have reinstated them.

Many thanks for your vigilance here, Pimms, and apologies for taking so long to get back to you on this.

The Eds.


Possessive apostrophes

Post 7

Pimms

No worries smiley - smiley

Pimms (working through the backlog smiley - run)


Key: Complain about this post