A Conversation for Tommy Flowers
A1002420 - Tommy Flowers
McKay The Disorganised Posted Mar 19, 2003
Excellent Who? Tom Flowers was treated very poorly by his country, considering his contributions. Of course, the fact he was seen as technical rather than theoretical, contributed to this, but the integrity of the man, linked to the short-sightedness of Whitehall allowed the world to overtake the leap Britain had made.
A1002420 - Tommy Flowers
Who? Posted Mar 19, 2003
I made the point of political lack of foresight in 'Early Electronic Computers'. It was rather difficult to do this entry as I had covered many of the Colossus points in the earlier entry. I hope I didn't repeat myself too much!
A1002420 - Tommy Flowers
Zarquon's Singing Fish! Posted Mar 19, 2003
A great entry, who? and very poignant!
Poor man, not being able to get a job doing what he was good at because he could not reveal he had already been working at it!
A1002420 - Tommy Flowers
Gubernatrix Posted Mar 19, 2003
Excellent entry, Who?
I didn't quite understand this section towards the end:
>>>Even then, much credit was given to Alan Turing,
Credit for what, exactly?
>>who started the idea of a 'computer' in the 1930s and worked on the Enigma project. He died in 1954. Tommy said quite firmly, "Alan Turing had nothing to do with it!"
Nothing to do with what?
>>Tommy the Technician did not sound as good to some as Alan the Mathematical Alchemist.
To whom?
Basically I am a bit puzzled as to what you are getting at here. Are you suggesting that Turing was wrongly credited with something that Flowers did? Or is it just the case that he is more famous and that therefore people *assume* that he 'invented computers' or whatever?
Or perhaps it is that Turing and Flowers both made important contributions to computing, but worked completely independently of each other?
Also, who are the people who prefer Turing to Flowers? Is it whoever writes the history books? Or do you mean the government of the day who rewarded one but not the other?
A1002420 - Tommy Flowers
Who? Posted Mar 19, 2003
Points noted and acted upon (where possible)
1) credit - for Colossus, which should now explain the 'nothing to do with it'.
2) As for the remainder of your queries.........
PASS !
Your guess is as good as mine. It is not easy to explain the rest. Some say 'government' (to cover Bletchley Park activities), some say 'the university set' (looking after their own) and as for preference.........
Makes a great debate, doesn't it? Perhaps someone can come up with answers....
...perhaps not.
Congratulations - Your Entry has been Picked for the Edited Guide!
h2g2 auto-messages Posted Mar 28, 2003
Your Guide Entry has just been picked from Peer Review by one of our Scouts, and is now heading off into the Editorial Process, which ends with publication in the Edited Guide. We've therefore moved this Review Conversation out of Peer Review and to the entry itself.
If you'd like to know what happens now, check out the page on 'What Happens after your Entry has been Recommended?' at EditedGuide-Process. We hope this explains everything.
Thanks for contributing to the Edited Guide!
Key: Complain about this post
Peer Review: A1002420 - Tommy Flowers
More Conversations for Tommy Flowers
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."