h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

When I was thirteen I was reading "The Happy Hooker" (I'd borrowed it from a cousin), and that was almost thirty years ago. I'm thankful that my first real exposure to sex was from a woman who enjoyed it very much, but had really bad experiances as well. It left me balanced, I think. Ah, and to the question of the thread, I don't. I can do it easily enough without the mechanics if it's just to 'get off' and I realllllllllllly prefer the presence of a guy in any case.

Hello? Anybody in here?



*tink-tink-ink-ink-k*


Thought so.

*Sex between a man and a woman can be a wonderful thing, between three or four it can be fantastic!*

Woody Allen

September's Good Housekeeping magazine - I kid you not - had an article about vibrators. They did a consumer test and made some recommendations.

Zoomer! Nice to see you here! I read the whole thread before jumping in and I wanted to tell you how impressed I was by your posts! Wowsa. You write like a naughty novel! Now, to the provocateur, tell us who won!

(by the way, that's a facinating handle)

Nice to meet you as well, your name is enchanting and saucy at the same time!

I at your compliment but am too lazy to check what you mean. Who won what?

The post just before my last one. Good Housekeeping magazine compared and rated vibrators. I was wondering which one won. Geez and how did they compare them? How much detail would Good Housekeeping go into. Which reminds me of one of the movies they showed us at school begining in the fifth grade. The only one I remember was produced by none other than the Walt Disney studios. They refered to sex as "skin to skin contact" and the way it was demonstrated was with two transparent shapes, like you'd find on public bathroom doors, one blue, one pink, overlapping each other.

I want to know how vibrators are necessary for good housekeeping- I've clearly been doing something wrong

...a happy worker!

What about the aforementioned *Ben-Wa* balls while doing housework? Again a clearly sexist invention that makes doing cleaning a pleasure for only one sex!!

to find back copy of Good Housekeeping.........

Found it on teenage son's bedroom floor under a pile of FHMs - thread deviation alert - these are referred to as For Horny Mingers in our house.


GH divided their researched items into four categories - Best Straight Up, Best Clit*ral Stimulator, Best Got It All and Best Dual Action. You can probably get more info from their website. I would give more details here but am not sure what's likely to be 'removed' on grounds of advertising etc.

It was noted that one product included a rather alarming notice on the packaging - "Not to be used on swollen areas" .

According to GH, more vibrators are now sold in Britain than washing machines or tumble dryers.

(Someone asked about the name-tag - it refers to a certain evening last week in Guildford)

A1162423 for details if interested

I've clicked on that link twice thinking it might be about the GH article.

call me a pedantic little nob cheese, but surely a vibrator that doesn't vibrate is simply an or. isn't dildo a hobbit? shit, sorry, wrong forum. i'l get me coat...

By the way, what month was that magazine? The online GH site doesn't have the term "vibrator" turn up anything in their search engine and searching the archives requires you know the month of the article's publication.

call me a pedantic nob cheese, but surely a vibrator that doesn't vibrate is simply an or. and isn't dildo a hobbit? i'll get me coat...

just reaised I posted two copies of that. what a divot i am. three cheers for nubbin diddling!

...and another for luck....

I looked as well, and found nothing, either on the UK version or the NA version....pity....

On a lighter note, whilst perusing porno I came across (ooops, I mean I found...) a picture of a young lady who was using something which resembled a fig leaf which was strapped on like a thong. It was a remote control vibrator which had two *protruding parts* (one obviously much smaller) and a ridge type bit for the female protruding part. All merrily buzzzzzzing away. Again made to be under underwear with a small control box to be secreted on one's person (I assume in a pocket of trousers).

Once again I must protest, why hasn't something like this been invented for boys?

I cannot imagine getting through an hour with any semblance of anything like decorum with something like that going on in my pants. Same for the Ben-WA balls. Do you guys think you'd be able to REALLY get through a couple of HOURS of that kind of stimulation? HOURS? With something messing with your privates? I don't think I could drive, or work, or carry on a conversation.

But then I can't do any of the above after a couple of drinks either, so maybe it's just me.

I get distracted enough in a vibrating bus seat, thank you very much

This post has been removed.