A Conversation for A Brief History of Greece

Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 21

sirXixo

So in a while, you are going to say that the invation of Iraq was because the US and UK wanting to help the pure iraqis! And save them from the bad Sadam! Because that what it sais on BBC


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 22

Gnomon - time to move on

No I am not going to say that. Don't put words into my mouth. Go away and read up on the real history of your country.


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 23

sirXixo

HAHAHA!You still haven't told me where are you from!


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 24

sirXixo

And I have read my real history of my country and you should do the same because wikipedia its not an objective website! I think there is a reason why you can't quote thinks from there in Universities!


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 25

Gnomon - time to move on

What has Wikipedia got to do with anything? I haven't read it.

I'm from Ireland. I don't know everything about Greek history, but then, neither do you.


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 26

lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned


Hi SirXixo,

I have left you a message in your Personal Space, which will help you find your way about Hootoo smiley - ok

It will also explain what type of site we are smiley - smiley

Perhaps then you will feel you can submit your own works to our Edited Guide smiley - biggrin


lil
<./>ACE</.>


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 27

sirXixo

You keep saying that! But its your believes that don;t change not mine!

I don't understand what is so difficult to understand?


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 28

sirXixo

That's your solution! My friend! I just gave the link from were you took everything! You do understand by leaving you just prove me right! The link is on the board if you press it you will notice that the exact paragraph is from wikipedia!

But again! You should go and chase some green little fellow at the end of the rainbow! And leave reality to other people!


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 29

Gnomon - time to move on

You are rude and insulting, but that doesn't make you right.

I'll forgive your ignorance of world affairs. You obviously don't know that all the inhabitants of the Falkland Islands are of English descent, that Argentina never owned these islands and that nobody of Argentinian descent ever lived on them. The only reason the Argentinians think they are theirs is because they are close to Argentina.

But you should really learn a bit more about your own history. Go and learn the truth, then come back and apologise to me. Or better still, apologise now, then go and learn the truth.

smiley - smiley


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 30

Gnomon - time to move on

I'm going to leave this conversation now as well. This does NOT "prove you right". If you think so, then all that has been proved is that you are a fool. You have a lot to learn about discussion and argument, as well as about history.


Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Post 31

sirXixo

And somehow! You are making a point by leaving the conversation? What happened did wikipedia shut down and you don't have anything else to say? I mean your argument is "Oh! I am going to leave now!"
Good for you mate! I wish good luck! And who knows! Maybe one day in the parliament! Oh! No you can become a PR spokesman! Or even a Lobbyist! YEs! Yes! You can have a small laptop behind the table and loged in in wikipedia! And you can give them unreferenced answers as you did with me!

HAHAHAHAHAHA! And you forgive my ingorance of world affairs! HAHAHA! First of all: When an Island's population is 80% of argetinians and 20% british (not exact numbers) and its outsidde argetina that doesn't mean it belongs to england! Its funny you know! Everybody blames US for wars and everything! Is it england better? India, africa and lot of other countries ! And you call me ignorant!
But now I know that you are propably really young to understant what a fool you are!
You are a fool even supporting the idea that the Falklnads were british! But its OK! Thanks god for people like you that are supporting all the idiotic excuses that some countries use to get rich!


Key: Complain about this post

Although the Greeks would describe the 400 years of Turkish rule as slavery, they were in fact treated quite well. The Turks were ruthless in war, but in peace they favoured a pluralist society, and were prepared to allow their Greek 'subjects' to do as t

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more