h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Mr. Bush has truly reassured me that the world is a safer place since the invasion and occupation of Iraq. I feel so much better.

http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/10/25/iraq.explosives/index.html

I agree. If I was American I would campaign for Bush.

did you read the story?

No I didn't anaga, but I am for Bush as being the lesser of two evils. I cannot trust Kerry even to be the Catholic he professes to be. Bush is a better Catholic than Kerry even though he isn't one. I should add that I am a founder of a pro-life newsletter for government employees and that now I have retired I still continue to send it to them.

I happen to think being Pro life is the most important thing in the world right now.

I wouldn't call Bush pro life, coinsidering he is pro-death penalty and pro- killing Iraqis, but I suppose that is beside the point....

Good work, Pondero. It's this kind of absolute idiocy Bush is counting on in his re-election effort.

"During Bush's first visit, the presidents agreed that the nations are friends and that they should work "to develop constructive relations of cooperation." (30) Bush also assured Jiang that he strongly supports China's entry into the WTO. The American president thanked China for its firm support and cooperation in fighting terrorism. The presidents agreed that their states are important partners in combating terrorism and that a medium- and long-term mechanism for antiterrorism cooperation might be established between both states. (31) Jiang told the press that although there are some existing differences, both China and the United States have extensive common interests. Consequently, they would hold high-level strategic dialogues and push forward exchanges and cooperation in the fields of economy, trade, energy, and others. (32)"

...and being a pro-lifer" he is also an advocate of open relations with China which not only is one of the World's worst human-rights abuser, actively hunts down pregnant women, forces them to have abortions and kills full-term babies as they are being born.... by the thousands. No mention of that in his little "Your my best pal" comments about China.

Yep. He's pro-life, alright.

This post has been removed.

No point in arguing with someone who has their head so deep in the sand.

I will make one point (again, since it has been said time, and time again)...

The American occupation of Iraq is doing nothing more thancreating more and more of the "Moslem [sic] fundamentalists" of which you speak. Every time an American convoy shoots into a crowd of civilians, it makes more civilians rise up against those who have invaded their country illegally.

These are not Muslim fundamentalists, for the most part, they are iraqi citizenry standing up, just as you would if a foreign army marched in and started bombing the crap out of you, to a force that is killing, em mass, citizens in the name of "War on Terror". Yes, there are fundamentalists who are involved, but then you can't tell me that when Bush makes statements like "God has spoken to me" before invading Iraq, he isn't a behaving in exactly the same way.

A religious zealot is a religious zealot whether Muslim or Christian.

By the way, whether my mother would or would not choose abortion (she's 80, so the point is moot) would be her decidsion.

As for abortion, I am all for a woman who has informed consent having one, but against the right of a government such as China forcing women to have them, a point which you neatly sidestepped in your reply.

As I said Bush makes no remarks on China killing thousands of babies (full term) against the wishes of the parents, but takes the holy road of telling women in the US that they can't do so.

>Imagine also as a kid that your Mam had some abortions because she didn't want the children in her womb at that time. >

Where do you get off making disgusting remarks about my mother, in the first place. I think you owe me and my mother an apology.

If my mother had aborted me, I wouldn't have an opinion about it one way or another, having never existed enough to decide if life was worth having. All those people getting killed in Iraq are in a position to form that opinion.

Unborn children are parasites, as they cannot live without the host, and the host suffers tremendous physiological damage as a result of the parasite. It is therefore perfectly within the rights of the host to determine whether to suffer the parasite or seek a cure.

Interesting topic drift...

We are all parasites as you call them at an early stage of development, but we develop into human beings. However, the fetus's blood circulation is separate from the mother, but the fetus does feed on her, hence you derogatory buzz word "parasite".. Oh I'm scared its a naughty word is "parasite", to be used in the battle.

Oh well, have it your way, but no-one has the right to kill a parasite which will develop into a human being.

The world will be a safer place once we all look at the depopulation of western nations due to abortion. To correct this change the law, ban abortions.

What have I created? By bleeding journal has a posting under moderation! And I didn't even get to see it! (except for the bit about Mudhooks' mother, who, from all accounts is a very nice lady, so I'm not sure how she got into a thread about missing explosives in Iraq).

Anyway. Great. Bush says he's "pro-life". He sure as hell is no kind of Christian I've ever experienced, fundamentalist or otherwise. Anyone with a hint of spiritual sensitivity (and a Judeo-Christian background) would see quite clearly that he is an agent of Satan, but I certainly don't expect a lot of people to have that kind of sensitivity these days.

Anyway. My point, and it's not just my point, was that Bush stuck all of our asses, including the asses of all the unborn children in the world, into a lethal hornet's nest named Iraq and he didn't offer us the least bit of protection or the least bit of a say in where he was going to stick all those innocent little baby asses.

Frankly, Pondero, voting for Bush because he lies about his religion and his concern for the unborn is about as brilliant as retroactively voting for Mussolini because he has a big chin and promises to make the trains run on time.

And, if you are going to post a response to my journal entries, Pondero, I would appreciate if you at least glanced at the journal entry and the link before you stuff your personal agenda down my cyberthroat. If you don't like the little facts I present in my journal, take me off your friends list (you'll notice, perhaps, that I am exceptionally picky about who I put on my friends list).

What I have written I have written. Do what you will anhaga.

Simulpost, Pondero.

The world will be a safer place once we all look at our own bloody business instead of imposing our lamebrained religious whims on people who have every right to be free of such imposition. To correct this change the law: ban idiots.

(Be practical, Pondero. Ban abortions and give every girl a coathanger on their twelfth birthday. Or better yet, why not just bring back infanticide for girls: that would save a lot of suffering over the way you're planning to kill them. Or maybe we could just provide abortions for prospective mothers of girls. So practical, isn't it. What a safe world you seek.)

Simulpost again, Pondero.

I can't take myself off your friends list. I would appreciate it if you would please do so. Scroll down to the friends list on your space and click on "delete" by my name, please. I really would appreciate it.

Well, the truth will out, now I know what kind of a person you really are. I complained about your post in which you implied that people who think like I do are idiots.That comment about coat-hangers was uncalled for. The number of backstreet abortions was greatly exagerated by the pro abortion group, who lied, to get their way in 1973 with Roe v Wade.

I will try to disassociate myself from you asap.

Try to get your facts straight. I'm the one who wrote the post that implied people who think like you do are idiots. Only I didn't imply it. I came right out and said it.

Abortion is far below the radar screen this election. Neither of the major candidates is paying any particular attention to the issue. Why? Because they understand priorities. With our military under siege, our international reputation wrecked, and the global threat to Americans higher than it has been since the Berlin Wall came down, there are more important things to deal with.

During the debates both candidates agreed national security was the most important issue facing the nation. And both agreed that nuclear proliferation was the greatest threat to national security... though Bush seemed to be jumping on the bandwagon after Kerry there.