This is the Message Centre for friendlywithteeth

Your Human Geography entry...

Post 1

DogManStar

...is about to be sub edited by me. Looks pretty good as it is, but I'll keep you posted if I do anything.

Cheers

DogManStar


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 2

friendlywithteeth

Thanks very much smiley - smiley

I haven't had an entry get this far before, so I dont really know whats happening

But thanks very much smiley - smiley

FwT: all smiley - smiley


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 3

DogManStar

Well, it's nothing to worry about. I always show the Researcher what I'm proposing to do before I send it off to the Guide proper, so don't worry about 'losing control' of the entry.

Cheers

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 4

friendlywithteeth

Good good smiley - smiley Im not worried about losing control: more just have no idea what happens now!

smiley - cheers

FwT


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 5

friendlywithteeth

how long does this usually take?

Not nagging or anything...just feeling rather lost! smiley - winkeye


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 6

DogManStar

To be perfectly honest I've done nothing more than just read through it to get a feel for it, at the moment. I shall be looking at finishing over the weekend.

We get four weeks per batch of four entries, but some take longer than others to do, so it's hard to say. If the general syntax is ok most time is spent finding links etc. Sometimes you really have to butcher an entry to make it workable - this won't be happening in this case, however!

Cheers

DogManStar


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 7

friendlywithteeth

No problems! I wasnt expecting a 'youve had it ten minutes, why is it not in the edited guide!'

I was just asking what happens, as I have little idea whats going on!

No rush smiley - smiley


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 8

DogManStar

No problem. Ask away! Any of us will help you with any questions you have - well, you know this anyway, being an ACE!

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 9

friendlywithteeth

smiley - ok


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 10

friendlywithteeth

smiley - ok


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 11

DogManStar

OK, have finished my primary Editing, which consists of syntax changes and polishing up the text block.

I did carry out quite a few changes to the syntax, mainly 'stripping it down', as the arguements you are putting forward are rather complex to the unitiated, and I didn't want to see the article lose any of it's gravitas.

Incidentally, I have just written a series of essays on urban regeneration for my degree, and it isn't the saviour it at first appears!

I'll be adding links and having a final shuffle through in the next couple of days.

Cheers

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 12

DogManStar

... I have a question: who is Brett Wallach? I Google searched for him, and just came up with an essay. I don't really want to leave the name dangling there without a qualifying reference.

Cheers

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 13

friendlywithteeth

Hi DMS!

Your version looks great smiley - ok

To be honest...I don't know who BW is! I was just looking for a definition and he was who I found! I'll look for another one, from another source if you want though!


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 14

DogManStar

OK, that's cool. I might have to chop his name out altogether and kind of busk around it: believe me, we'll get cut to ribbons otherwise.

Will be finishing all my tampering tomorrow. It's a good article, by the way, although I personally think the arguement is a little flawed. But vive la difference!

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 15

DogManStar

OK - done. I'll send it back tomorrow. Couldn't find anything, anywhere about Brett Wallach, in the end.

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 16

friendlywithteeth

Do you want me to find another definition: I'll check the RGS if you want...

What don't you like about the argument? I like diversity smiley - biggrin


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 17

DogManStar

Actually, the only thing I found slightly awry in the entry were the comments about urban regeneration, and this is only because I have been studying this very thing for University recently. Urban regeneration is a good idea, and certainly better than leaving vast areas derelict. However in the case studies I used Hull, Canary Wharf and Sheffield, it was clear that although the physical appearance of the areas had been changed, the communities that once existed there had been lost forever, and it is community that breathes life into an area rather than, for example, shopping centres and cinemas.

However, your article is about Human Geography, and not specifically urban regeneration, so there is no need to worry about the article itself, which was very good.

DMS


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 18

friendlywithteeth

What do you mean specifically? I will change the things if you want...I bow to your superior knowledge smiley - ok

Glad you like it smiley - smiley


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 19

DogManStar

No need to change anything - it's a good article. We've got a little side tracked on an half-related, albeit interesting, topic.

Sending this off to the Guide now, well done again.

Cheers

DogManStar


Your Human Geography entry...

Post 20

friendlywithteeth

OK smiley - smiley

Thanks for sub-edding it!

So where are you doing your geography degree?


Key: Complain about this post