h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

When compared to Gabriela Robin so and other general acts of derision

You're so evil for saying that, you make Evilclaw look like a cute friendly pacifist bunny in comparison. I don't know how you'll sleep tonight, really I don't.

I'm just being honest

There is honesty and then there is just plain lies, I mean imagine what would you would say if I honestly said 'Antartica does'nt exist'.

While you could, indeed, make such a claim, there would be some difficulty in justifiably assigning to it the epithet which you have applied to the statement inasmuch as the precise correlation between the information you would be communicating and the facts insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated is such as to cause epistemological problems of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can reasonably be requested to bear.

Well it's testing the paradigm of causality basing the claim that ethnographic reflexes are at work proving nothing independently exists with a sort of post-decartésian philosophy in, by way, that everything is either a perception, interferance or a social construct of a third party.

"I'm not what I'm not, what I am is a result of centuries of culture and society"

So you accept my original statement and further accept that your statement could not, withought causing ireparable harm to the accepted and understood definitions of the english language, be considered, insofar as the epthets are understood and when compared to that which is already known, be considered to be either truthful or honest?

No because truth and honesty are two entirely different concepts. Truth is a perception as related to reality caused by the paradigm stated above while honesty is only as reputable as the person who claimed to be honest.

Being evil and a man seriously damages your reputation ergo your honesty is questionable.

Honesty is not variable, it is not the same as true, you are correct, but that is because something can be true while not being honest, that is it may not be untrue but may be misleading.

Precisely, therefore we can both be right and truthful while having totally conflicting views.

Look, it's quite simple,
IF A = !B;
AND A = 1;
THEN B=0;
ENDIF




PS I'm not a capitalist, honest

Since when has maths proved anything?

Lots of times, although strictly speaking the above is a logic statement, not pure maths

Numbers are involved ergo maths!

So football positions are maths? The difference between Radio1, Radio2, Radio3 and Radio4 is maths? A barcode is maths? The square root of -1 is Maths?

...

Well ok, I'll admit that last one _is_ maths

Fine, numbers are involed in maths and lazy identification systems.

And DVDs and CDs, in fact any digital entertainment system.

As I say lazy identification systems, binary code could easily be called 'dots' and 'dashes' rather than 'ones' and 'zeros'.

I mean look at the identification the industry is general, I mean the names 'DVD's and 'CD's are just random letters put together. I would have called them 'digidisks' and 'compidisks' if I had my way. They are much are far more exciting and invigerating names.

I blame men personally for lazy name making, if only men existed in the world everybody would be called 'Steve' or adopt there national insurance number as their formal identity.

Don't be silly...national insurance numbers are way too complicated.

Besides most of the worlds problems can be traced back to women so

Well we were bored, between looking pretty and in the buisness of looking pretty we told men to do things.