This is the Message Centre for DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me!
Who told you I was a teenager?
Researcher 538645 Posted Jan 13, 2004
No I'm not iunterested in arguing any points. Post 5 is moronic and rehashed from a thousand times that it's been used before. A moron makes moronic writings.
I would suggest you check your spelling before insinuating I am one.
"the mental capacity to inderstand this"
Are you going to drop this any time soon? I'm beginning to undestand what Della was on about.
Who told you I was a teenager?
azahar Posted Jan 13, 2004
blicky,
Time out! (blows whistle)
I've just posted something to Empty Sky on the 'no subject' thread and I hope all of you (blicky, Della and you too wraith) will read it.
The insinuation in posting 5 from Member was quite out of line, in my opinion. Okay, he didn't actually come out and say Della was racist, but he did insinuate it. But I still think he is the only person to have leapt to this unfair conclusion.
Della - nobody thinks you are a racist! Okay? And if Member does, well that's his problem.
Anyhow, please read my posting on the 'no subject' thread. Meanwhile, blicky, please try to calm down because I don't think this argument is going anywhere as it is. I can understand your anger and frustration but writing postings in anger doesn't do anybody any good.
az
Who told you I was a teenager?
azahar Posted Jan 13, 2004
Oh, sorry wraith, here it is:
F120604?thread=365155&post=4690472#p4690472
az
Who told you I was a teenager?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jan 14, 2004
Good luck, Wraith! I just checked out the 'no subject' thread, which I didn't know about - and all I can say is whoa! Scary.
azahar keeps going on about me apologising for using the W word. It means what I said elsewhere that it means - I had never heard (Blicky's and now azahar's)definition. I am assured (by Jimmy and others here in Ak,) that it *means* what I thought it did - i.e., phoney, wannabe etc. Blicky has elsewhere accepted this definition, which is why I will not apologise - given that elsewhere, I *have* in fact made up with him. Why azahar and Hoo/Member/Number want to keep it going, I can't fathom... azahar is on the god thread trying to make me apologise to other people for things even more unfathomable!
In fact, I am unclear what they said the W word meant to begin with.
As for Oetzi... who *knows* what's eating him?
Who told you I was a teenager?
azahar Posted Jan 14, 2004
<>
Actually it was Jez who asked you for an apology - twice! Because twice you posted on the god thread that she had said things about you that she had never said. I only mentioned to Jez that she probably shouldn't hold her breath waiting for you to apologise, all things considered.
You also posted things about me there, saying I had called you things that I have never called you. But I didn't ask you to apologise.
az
Who told you I was a teenager?
azahar Posted Jan 14, 2004
oh, not at all - it's just that once again Della is saying things about me that are not true:
<>
That is a totally untrue statement.
az
Who told you I was a teenager?
Researcher 538645 Posted Jan 14, 2004
Only a psyciatrist can say someone is lieing when they claim something is unfathomable.
I need a real challenge.
Who told you I was a teenager?
badger party tony party green party Posted Jan 14, 2004
I would suggest you check your spelling before insinuating I am one.
"the mental capacity to inderstand this"
Oh dear, Wraith you are right and spotted what my teachers always knew my slap dash approach to spelling is atrocious, but look at any "qwerty" keyboard and you will see that the U is next to the I. So that error is a typo.
It was an error of mine to think you would be able to honestly inderstand or understand and debate anything when it should have been clear to me that your were blinded by your loyalty to Della.
I do not accept Della or Jimmy's definition of the word because Della is a proven liar and her son can hardly be deemed to be a independent source of information can he.
Della has admitted that words taken by some to be a normal noun can be seen by others as an insult. That both meanings can be mutually exclusive and yet in this case (if there are indeed two widely held meanings and we have no evidence that it has the meaning she says anywhere else but in her head) she refused point blank to acknowledge any other meaning and went on the attack. This is sad because I gave a calm reply (if it was a little glib) that had no anger and explained why using the word was offensive.
Her response throughout the whole matter has been nothing short of insensitive to the negative impact it could have on others as this is a public site. I dont believe in hiding reality, thats why I responded to it and didnt yikes her. Im not scared of words but people who go around whinging about the 100 times more times hurt they have felt without seeming to consider the hurt their words can cause other people. It becomes more worrying when they are backed up by people who think I should not be bothered about this because what they post does not amount to Apartheid need to be challenged about there attitudes to "race" problems.
One of the biggest reasons that racism persists is that quite often those who perpitrate it and just as importantly those who dont and can even be considered to be anti-racist are not aware of what it really is and the harm it does. I seriously doubt that Della had any intention of racially abusing me or anyone else, but her refusal to accept she has does not diminish the fact that she has. So she did it invonlutarily, this makes it all the more important that she learns more about the subject and does not out of hand reject information that others offer her. You likewise need to understand that there is more to racism than Apartheid.
I await your marks out of ten for my pelling
Who told you I was a teenager?
badger party tony party green party Posted Jan 14, 2004
Only a psyciatrist can say someone is lieing when they claim something is unfathomable.
Maybe az thinks Della is lieing because she knows her to be an unrepentant liar. If that is az's opinion, Della has the chance to change her mind by proving otherwise.
You by trying to make yourself look more intelligent than az,
I need a real challenge.
miss the point that az was merely seeking to help Della to get on with others better and only succeed in making yourself look a pompus arse with your cheap, woefully inaccurate and unecessary "point scoring"
You should get together with http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/U524695 you'll both have a whale of a time.
Who told you I was a teenager?
azahar Posted Jan 14, 2004
<>
It is an untrue statement because there is nowhere on the god thread where I have gone around trying to make Della apologise to other people for anything, fathomable or otherwise. You can have a look if you like. So, it's a lie.
Well, I'm outta here. I've also unsubbed from the 'no subject' thread (that Della says she didn't know about even though she had previously posted there? curious). Bye.
Who told you I was a teenager?
Researcher 538645 Posted Jan 14, 2004
"You likewise need to understand that there is more to racism than Apartheid.
I await your marks out of ten for my pelling"
How about just your comprehension ability. You're statement shows a woeful lack of comprehension of what I wrote.
Maybe you would like to know that you're insulting Della's older son.
Who told you I was a teenager?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jan 15, 2004
<>
How? I have yet to see any proof that I have *ever* lied about anything! There is no proof, because I have never lied - if az and Jez have got that impression, I am sorry for them! The accusation camne from Hoo/Member/Number originally I believe, but he had no proof either, just a bunch of assertions.... (such as that the public computer without access to other sites, that I was using, was a myth! (What was *that* about?) He's called everyone else he's ever disagreed with a liar, from Insight to az herself.
If it's about having more than one sign-on, Hoo/Member/Number has 3 himself and counting. Further, I never claimed to be anyone different - anyone had only to ask, as I am blue in the face from telling people!
Who told you I was a teenager?
badger party tony party green party Posted Jan 15, 2004
Well lets not have it going around that I insult youngsters.
What Jimmy is supposed to have said has come through Della. Della who point blank told people that she was leaving the site when infact she was staying but only using one sign-on there are other examples of her lying, but I wont even stoop to what Hoo called lies when she was posting inaccurate figures on the PBA thread, I could give more if you like....?
"Jimmys information" could perhaps be influenced by the fact that he wnts to support his mother and tainted by the fact that he lives under the influence of someone who is very stressed at the moment. He also lives with someone who tells us shes a christian.
"Honour thy father and mother"
Who told you I was a teenager?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jan 15, 2004
Noto bene, BB. Wraith is *not* Jimmy - who is here, but under a name I won't tell you, cos I don't want him attacked as well!
I said Adele was leaving, and 'she' has - I didn't say I was. As I've asked all over the place - why does Hoo/Member/Number not get blasted for his 3+ identities - especially as *he* doesn't admit to them?
You *know* why my figures on the PBA thread were inaccurate (not lies). I was using the public computer Hoo wanted to deny the existence of - oops, he had a different identity then, didn't he?
Come on BB - let's have some more examples of my 'lies'? I notice, you don't have any.
BTW, did you even read the message on your space that I put this afternoon? If you did - did you take any notice?
Key: Complain about this post
Who told you I was a teenager?
- 21: Researcher 538645 (Jan 13, 2004)
- 22: azahar (Jan 13, 2004)
- 23: Researcher 538645 (Jan 13, 2004)
- 24: azahar (Jan 13, 2004)
- 25: Researcher 538645 (Jan 13, 2004)
- 26: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 14, 2004)
- 27: Researcher 538645 (Jan 14, 2004)
- 28: azahar (Jan 14, 2004)
- 29: Researcher 538645 (Jan 14, 2004)
- 30: azahar (Jan 14, 2004)
- 31: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 14, 2004)
- 32: Researcher 538645 (Jan 14, 2004)
- 33: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 14, 2004)
- 34: badger party tony party green party (Jan 14, 2004)
- 35: badger party tony party green party (Jan 14, 2004)
- 36: azahar (Jan 14, 2004)
- 37: Researcher 538645 (Jan 14, 2004)
- 38: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 15, 2004)
- 39: badger party tony party green party (Jan 15, 2004)
- 40: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 15, 2004)
More Conversations for DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me!
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."