A Conversation for An Introduction to Scrying
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
aka Bel - A87832164 Posted Feb 7, 2006
<./>A9208659 </.>
I think Gnomon suggested a semicolon here .
dreams, some -dreams; some...
And you missed a fullstop after use ( it wrapped at all other times when not in use )
and I think
ie mineral or spring, water
should be : mineral- or spring water.
Not too sure about the last one, though. Apart from that, I can't spot any other mistakes.
The question has already been asked : what do you 'charde' the crystal ball with ? Energy ? Light ? Would be nice if you could elaborate that a bit
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Wilma Neanderthal Posted Feb 7, 2006
Yowza, Serephina, move over, I'm incoming!! Excellent entry
Here's my nitpicks:
pleasent-smelling pleasant
astrolgical symbols astrological
ie ?? should this have fullstops? It doesn't look quite right like that.
Love this entry despite being a sad fullblown cafflick</>
W
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Serephina Posted Feb 7, 2006
Wilma.
I think it's usually ie rather than i.e in entries intended for the edited guide but I may be wrong.
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Serephina Posted Feb 7, 2006
Im actually rightfor once? yay maybe all the advice in here has been sinking in after all ..Mr Dreadful will be pleased
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013 Posted Feb 8, 2006
Are Pagans all practitioners of magical arts? Is that part of the belief system or is it that some Pagans also believe in the magical stuff?
Just curious
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013 Posted Feb 8, 2006
The first sentence sort of implies that they do:
"used commonly by Witches and other practioners of magical arts such as Pagans."
Perhaps it would be better to remvoe the reference to them and and the sentence after arts?
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Dr Hell Posted Feb 8, 2006
"I just want you to think abbout the way you worded your criticism."
Thank you very much B'Elana. So anyone who is not soft and fluffy will be an aggressive type with the charm of a concrete mixer. I can live with that.
Look:
#1 VIVE LA DIFFERENCE!
(I have no problem with this eventually going into EG)
#2 BUT...
This Entry is about some kind of superstitious thing which I would call hokuspokus. (If you were a tolerant person, would leave me with my opinion.)
Some people (not me) may be in doubt whether this is real or not. They might read this and even go out and buy all the gizmos recommended, load them under full-moon light, and try to figure out the next numbers in the lottery.
I acknowledge that it is hard to write about something intrinsically non-factual. I was just suggesting that *instead* of weaseling *all* passages out (which would affect the reading flow and the quality of the text), a small disclaimer-ish phrase in the beginning of this Entry would be enough.
Then:
"I was just thinking about other people who might be reading this... People who think this hokus-pokus might actually work beyond the level of - how do I call it - 'subjective perception'.<< Meaning what ? That you are the only person who can read this and put it off as 'hokus-pokus', and every other reader is a potential victim ?"
I am certainly not the only one who thinks this is all mumbo-jumbo (but hey - *that* is not the problem). And I wouldn't say *victim*. I just think that some people might not be entirely aware that this does not work for *real*. They're not going to get the lottery numbers. What they will (perhaps) get is some 'subjective perception' - that might be totally uncorrelated with the actual future.
Next thing:
If discussions become quite heated when it comes down to... for example "Evolution versus Creationism", where both sides have their own debatable merits, why is it so hard to put in a small passage into this Entry, just stating that the entire subject is debatable? It's not going to do anyone harm, just clear things up for readers, saying hey, there are people out there who think this is not necessarily factual.
SAUSAGE
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013 Posted Feb 8, 2006
*sneaks back in and rearranges the v and the o and swaps an a for an e*
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Beatrice Posted Feb 8, 2006
Can I ask a technical question? If the answers from the ball are from your own subconscious, does this limit the applications to "reading your own mind" - ie no telling of the future, no seeing into other people's heads etc?
Just curious
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Feb 8, 2006
From what I've read, the magic users believe that they have the ability to read the future and to see into other people's minds, but the crystal ball or blackened mirror helps them focus these abilities.
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Serephina Posted Feb 8, 2006
The Tarot works in a simillar way lucky star.. people are more accepting of that strangly though!
I'll have a look at that sentance kelli
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Feb 8, 2006
>>people are more accepting of that strangly though
You think??!
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
cupati Posted Feb 8, 2006
I'd expect someone who accepted one would accept the other...
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
aka Bel - A87832164 Posted Feb 8, 2006
Re. post 33
>>(If you were a tolerant person, would leave me with my opinion.)<< where did I say that I wanted you to change your opinion ? I only asked you to think about your wording when commenting.
I don't believe in scrying, but then I don't believe in god, either. I'm curious, would you call the belief in god 'superstitous'? Would you call the Lord's Supper' Hokus Pokus, or mumbo-jumbo ?
Key: Complain about this post
A9208659 - The Art of Scrying
- 21: Serephina (Feb 7, 2006)
- 22: Serephina (Feb 7, 2006)
- 23: aka Bel - A87832164 (Feb 7, 2006)
- 24: Serephina (Feb 7, 2006)
- 25: Wilma Neanderthal (Feb 7, 2006)
- 26: Serephina (Feb 7, 2006)
- 27: Wilma Neanderthal (Feb 7, 2006)
- 28: Trin Tragula (Feb 7, 2006)
- 29: Serephina (Feb 7, 2006)
- 30: kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013 (Feb 8, 2006)
- 31: Serephina (Feb 8, 2006)
- 32: kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013 (Feb 8, 2006)
- 33: Dr Hell (Feb 8, 2006)
- 34: kelli - ran 2 miles a day for 2012, aiming for the same for 2013 (Feb 8, 2006)
- 35: Beatrice (Feb 8, 2006)
- 36: Gnomon - time to move on (Feb 8, 2006)
- 37: Serephina (Feb 8, 2006)
- 38: Gnomon - time to move on (Feb 8, 2006)
- 39: cupati (Feb 8, 2006)
- 40: aka Bel - A87832164 (Feb 8, 2006)
More Conversations for An Introduction to Scrying
- A88040063 - Neolassicistic Art - Mass Market and Industrialisation [6]
5 Days Ago - A88048849 - Gulls - a Beginner's Guide to Identification [5]
3 Weeks Ago - A88057191 - 'Cabin Pressure' - the Radio Comedy [11]
4 Weeks Ago - A88054590 - 'Mansfield Park' - a Novel by Jane Austen [1]
Aug 17, 2024 - A88048425 - Common Linnets - Tuneful Birds [3]
Apr 22, 2024
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."