A Conversation for Games Room

Numberwang

Post 841

Geggs

Only 90 posts since I last contributed to this thread 8 months ago! That's appalling.

Oh, and that last post was Numberwang!


Geggs


Numberwang

Post 842

Dr E Vibenstein (You know it is, it really is.)

smiley - erm

Some?


Numberwang

Post 843

Feisor - -0- Generix I made it back - sortof ...

More


Numberwang

Post 844

Geggs

Several


Numberwang

Post 845

Folderol

AS long as multiples are allowed:

'Quite a lot'


Numberwang

Post 846

Dr E Vibenstein (You know it is, it really is.)

Two less than that.


Numberwang

Post 847

Uncle Ghengis

Half as much again?


Numberwang

Post 848

Folderol

Then treble the reciprocal of that


Numberwang

Post 849

Feisor - -0- Generix I made it back - sortof ...

Sorry folks, I know it's obvious but the Shaftesbury Czenovolik rule has been there for a while .... so ....



38.5


Numberwang

Post 850

Folderol

That was very astute, Feisor, I'm impressed and I hope you will appreciate my reposte.

Southerby-Haig-Jones used this one when meeting a similar situation in the 1952 world semi's. Basically, he bifurcated the sine, arriving at:


13.714






Numberwang

Post 851

Feisor - -0- Generix I made it back - sortof ...

smiley - rolleyes

I had forgotten about that - but you have also reminded me of his opponent's brilliant response which, of course, I now use - with the obvious variation ...


1716


Numberwang

Post 852

Uncle Ghengis

I'm going to attempt a flanking manoeuvre with my cavalry giving:

40,000


Numberwang

Post 853

Folderol

Surely, that should be


600?


Numberwang

Post 854

Folderol

Sorry, everyone, that last number is, of course, rational, and therefore not within the spirit of this game. Let's revert to

40,000


Numberwang

Post 855

Feisor - -0- Generix I made it back - sortof ...

Well .... that's stunned me!


Naturally, my only response must be


5.875


Numberwang

Post 856

Uncle Ghengis

Hmm. I think 600 would be infantry, not cavalry.

But in any case...

87 (and a bit)


Numberwang

Post 857

Folderol

Good number, Uncle. Now, how about


61 - more or less?


Numberwang

Post 858

Uncle Ghengis

Yeah, I liked it.

But 61 is good too. And a prime - always good to pick a prime.

As for me, I'm going for a square:

169


Numberwang

Post 859

Folderol

Aha! The old Lucky thirteen trick, eh? Sorry, but I saw through it so my response will be a simple

17.8355 (recurring)


Numberwang

Post 860

Uncle Ghengis

Fourteen


Key: Complain about this post