A Conversation for The h2g2 Doctor Who Group
- 1
- 2
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
Bright Blue Shorts Posted Aug 12, 2009
I'd never really noticed how much they use music these days. But the discussion does remind me of how, in old horror films, they used to sudden bursts of music to make the audience jump as the monster or Dracula or whomever appeared; which later changed to using it at inappropriate times and silence at appropriate times to alter the audiences' conditioned expectations.
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
NPY Posted Aug 12, 2009
Think some of the music seems to be woven in so carefully that you might not consciously notice it. Know I've listened to soundtracks and thought "I don't remember that music" and watched it again and then picked up on it in the background.
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
Jozcoz Posted Aug 14, 2009
me too, thats what its supposed to be like though
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
RadoxTheGreen - Retired Posted Aug 15, 2009
The reason for the Keys of Marinus being 'Doctor-Lite' was that William Hartnell had booked those weeks off to go on holiday (it wouldn't happen today - well, unless Terry Wogan was playing the Doctor).
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk Posted Aug 21, 2009
It has oft been said that film/TV scores are like football referees: if you don't notice them, they're doing a good job.
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
van-smeiter Posted Aug 22, 2009
That may be true of music scores but it certainly isn't true of football referees! Football referees aren't noticed when the players are playing football but football referees *are* noticed when the players *aren't* playing football; much depends on all parties' knowledge of the laws of football. Mind you, there is the odd occasion when one isn't breaking the rules exactly but bending them a little.
As to music, I recently watched The Caves of Androzani dvd with the production/technical/whatever the term is subtitles and all one can hear is the music; there was a surprisingly small amount of music. Music can enhance and detract from visual experiences; truisms aren't true; unlimited rice pudding; et cetera, et cetera
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
NPY Posted Aug 31, 2009
Sounds like an interesting way of watching a DVD though. So there was no dialogue? Must be a bit odd.
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
Jozcoz Posted Sep 1, 2009
they do that on most of the old who dvds... shame they dont do it on the new ones as well...
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
NPY Posted Sep 20, 2009
Bit bizzare though. Will have a look at the couple of old ones I have though.
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
Old and new Who: Is there a difference?
- 21: Bright Blue Shorts (Aug 12, 2009)
- 22: NPY (Aug 12, 2009)
- 23: Jozcoz (Aug 14, 2009)
- 24: RadoxTheGreen - Retired (Aug 15, 2009)
- 25: eloisa (Aug 21, 2009)
- 26: Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk (Aug 21, 2009)
- 27: van-smeiter (Aug 22, 2009)
- 28: NPY (Aug 31, 2009)
- 29: Jozcoz (Sep 1, 2009)
- 30: NPY (Sep 20, 2009)
More Conversations for The h2g2 Doctor Who Group
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."