A Conversation for The SETI@Home Project
- 1
- 2
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Started conversation Aug 30, 2002
Have you ever come to the idea of how small we really are. And since the fourth dimention exists, nothing's perfect. Including humankind.
I think stars are bugger than us.
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 2, 2002
As the universe is endless, everything conceivably should be possible. Also alien life on other planets. It will probably be very differend from us, humans. And we can't even guess whether these aliens are more evolved or not. We even don't know if they have evolved along lines similar to ours. It is well possible they don't know anything about radio, but use telepathy or brainwaves. They also could have developed a quiet differend technology. So perhaps ESA should start looking at other possible ways of communication. Already laser light seems to be an option, but I don't know how far this possibility has been developed. Anyone?
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 2, 2002
Sorry, I mistakenly wrote Esa instead of Seti. Sorry for that!!
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Posted Sep 3, 2002
yeah, anything but radiowaves. They are just too slow. I don't know much about these lasers you mentioned. Perhaps we should research a little
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 4, 2002
Radiowaves are travelling with the speed of light, so that is ok. But I haven't a clue whether brain waves or telepathy are traveling at the same speed, if this kind of waves exist at all. Has there ever been any study on this subject and what do we know about it?
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Posted Sep 4, 2002
The speed of light is not fast enogh (see, the nearest star is 14 ly. from us. That's terrible if we want to communicate large. Research? Of course - all the time. But for now nothing can move faster tan light. Poo
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 5, 2002
Sorry, but there is nothing going faster than light. So you will have to invent something or find a way to go faster. Time travel also would follow the same principle.
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Posted Sep 12, 2002
What makes you think time travel is possibe?
See the endless time illusion
Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor Posted Sep 12, 2002
Time travel would only be possible if you can travel faster than the speed of light.
Which you can't.
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Posted Sep 17, 2002
I don't get it. the speed over the light speed is called "time travel"? It's ok if that has nothing to do with defying time as we lnow it. I mean, time seems to be the only thing we humans cannot beat it..if you get what i mean
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 18, 2002
The speed of light is not the same as time travel. The one has nothing to do with the other. So it makes no sense to say time travel should go faster than light. The speed of light is something that is measured and "proven" to be in accordance with Einstein's theory.
Time travel is hypothetical and not proven at all. People ask themselves :"what would happen IF we could move back or forward in time?". And next one can speculate about it. That is all.
See the endless time illusion
RadoxTheGreen - Retired Posted Sep 22, 2002
Bit of a pity then that Professor Paul Davies, the Australian theoretical physicist from Macquarie University, believes that he can prove the speed of light has actually slowed down over time. So much for our accepted laws of physics and our understanding of the beginning of the universe. Judging from the report on their website, NASA certainly seem to be taking him seriously too.
See the endless time illusion
Cefpret Posted Sep 22, 2002
Such things are not a problem for modern theories. As long as we don't know which mechanisms are responsible for the respective value of the speed of light, no sentence in the textbooks needs to be changed; only some to be added.
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 26, 2002
Light was slower initially, they say, but that does not mean something can go faster than light.
See the endless time illusion
Researcher 199266 Posted Sep 26, 2002
Sorry, I made a mistake. Light was going faster and in the course of billions of years seems to have slowed down. But still, Light is the fastest thing in the universe, unless proven diferently...
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Posted Sep 26, 2002
there must be a carbone-based creatures affected differently in terms of time and light. I mean, they... uh, foret it. I was thinking of how far from this issue are we humans. I should blame the cancer thing I'm born under it. Too much pressure on me, people!
See the endless time illusion
R. Daneel Olivaw -- (User 201118) (Member FFFF, ARS, and DOS) ( -O- ) Posted Oct 13, 2002
There is a science fiction book by Robert A Heinlein based on the idea that telepathy would allow instantaneous conversation between different solar systems. The title is Time for the Stars. It's really good.
See the endless time illusion
R. Daneel Olivaw -- (User 201118) (Member FFFF, ARS, and DOS) ( -O- ) Posted Oct 13, 2002
The nearist star, Proxima Centauri is four point something ly away. THe alpha centauri system is under 5 ly. Even sirius is only about 10 ly away.
See the endless time illusion
kanji saiyajin Posted Oct 13, 2002
yeah, telepathy! It'd be good if somebody could teach me that ;]
the book might be good only our best chances are no further than its frame... if you get what I mean
See the endless time illusion
dragonisaac Posted Nov 28, 2003
light is the fastest thing we know,so far, just wait til science find the real fastest thing
can we be open to other ideas?
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
See the endless time illusion
- 1: kanji saiyajin (Aug 30, 2002)
- 2: Researcher 199266 (Sep 2, 2002)
- 3: Researcher 199266 (Sep 2, 2002)
- 4: kanji saiyajin (Sep 3, 2002)
- 5: Researcher 199266 (Sep 4, 2002)
- 6: kanji saiyajin (Sep 4, 2002)
- 7: Researcher 199266 (Sep 5, 2002)
- 8: kanji saiyajin (Sep 12, 2002)
- 9: Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor (Sep 12, 2002)
- 10: kanji saiyajin (Sep 17, 2002)
- 11: Researcher 199266 (Sep 18, 2002)
- 12: RadoxTheGreen - Retired (Sep 22, 2002)
- 13: Cefpret (Sep 22, 2002)
- 14: Researcher 199266 (Sep 26, 2002)
- 15: Researcher 199266 (Sep 26, 2002)
- 16: kanji saiyajin (Sep 26, 2002)
- 17: R. Daneel Olivaw -- (User 201118) (Member FFFF, ARS, and DOS) ( -O- ) (Oct 13, 2002)
- 18: R. Daneel Olivaw -- (User 201118) (Member FFFF, ARS, and DOS) ( -O- ) (Oct 13, 2002)
- 19: kanji saiyajin (Oct 13, 2002)
- 20: dragonisaac (Nov 28, 2003)
More Conversations for The SETI@Home Project
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."