A Conversation for Website Developer's Forum

Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 1

C Hawke

I have some pages done using Dreamweaver MX, that contain javascripted popup menus, the bit that calls the thingy is

mmLoadMenus();

However of late (I guess a new version of DW) the code that gets added is



Whc Mozilla seems to ignore.

Any ideas - the former, when used works fine.

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 2

Ion the Naysayer

Try changing



to



Note the space between > and . This could be a side effect of quirks mode. Is there a <!DOCTYPE> statement at the start of the page?


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 3

DoctorMO (Keeper of the Computer, Guru, Community Artist)

I thought the lanauge atribute was depeseated in HTML4.0 and up?

anyway you forgot the version on it. and it's in Title Case, I thought it had to be in lower case, somthing I read somewere.

-- DoctorMO --


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 4

C Hawke

sorry guys, wrong bit cut and pasted above, from memory (at home now) the good one is

mmLoadMenus();

The bad one is

mmLoadMenus();

the only difference is the 2nd "1.2" didn't help me this PM cutting and pasting the wrong bit in.

Cheers

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 5

C Hawke

oh, and document fully typed (XHTML 1.0 transitional)

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 6

Pastey

If it's set as doc type xml, just try setting it as html or what ever the old one was. Even though a lot of the new wysiwyg programmes set the docs as xml, Mozilla is a little too strict to allow it.

smiley - rose


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 7

C Hawke

http://www.chawke.co.uk/index03.htm fails to work in Mozilla, but ok in IE6

is a test version

http://www.chawke.co.uk/index.htm is my current home page with working line

CH

(and yes I know I am using tables for layout, bad me smiley - biggrin, tried s but when I added loads of thumbnails was hard to ensure they got all on with relative (%) sized on 800x600 it went horribly wrong, maybe later)


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 8

Ion the Naysayer

"text/JavaScript1.2" isn't a valid MIME type. Changing it to just type="text/javascript" should fix it.


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 9

DoctorMO (Keeper of the Computer, Guru, Community Artist)

Ah yes, sounds right. I concure, now who's for a smiley - ale?

-- DoctorMO --


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 10

C Hawke

Odd the un-numbered version is what DW puts in at first, then when you use the command "Clean up XHTML" it changes it to the invalid one!!

I guess a glitch in DW

Cheers all smiley - biggrin

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 11

DoctorMO (Keeper of the Computer, Guru, Community Artist)

hmmm, odd.

-- DoctorMO --


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 12

Ion the Naysayer

You should send in a bug report. That's something they'll probably want to know about.


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 13

C Hawke

I take it you mean to Dreamweaver not Mozilla?

Never sure about how to contact Macromedia with bug reports, no real people to contact - their discussion forums occasionally have staff on, have found three bugs in the last few weeks (this included) and not sure who to tell. Let's put a question on their forums smiley - biggrin

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 14

Ion the Naysayer

Yep. Not Mozilla; It's not a Mozilla bug. text/javascript is the proper MIME type so Mozilla is doing the right thing here.

It's distressing when there's no way to report bugs to a company. They tend not to get fixed. smiley - sadface


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 15

C Hawke

http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform/

Actually tried to find it (after someone told me) the only link to it was simply "Request a feature" I suppose Bug fixing is a featuer "Now with working options" but not really the same

Cheers all.

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 16

DoctorMO (Keeper of the Computer, Guru, Community Artist)

Dreamweaver 2003, Now with added bug fixes? smiley - winkeye

-- DoctorMO --


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 17

C Hawke

...or of course as a bug has been defined as "undocumented feature" then the latest version could simply document them "now with advanced XHTML breaking feature"

smiley - biggrin

CH


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 18

DoctorMO (Keeper of the Computer, Guru, Community Artist)

If dosn't just work... it dosn't work! smiley - laugh

-- DoctorMO --


Why doesn't Mozilla like this

Post 19

DoctorMO (Keeper of the Computer, Guru, Community Artist)

it*


Key: Complain about this post