A Conversation for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]
- 1
- 2
I'm hopeless at maths
Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat Started conversation Jun 28, 2003
and would therefore be very obliged if someone could get 196757 to equal 42.
Here's some to keep you going.
I'm hopeless at maths
Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat Posted Jun 30, 2003
I'm hopeless at maths
Baron Grim Posted Jul 29, 2003
Ok... I've given my number more than casual thought but I still can't get 69725 to work. It seems like it should be easy, well easier than 109000 leastways. But I give. If anyone can cipher mine for me I'll be most grateful.
CZ
I'm hopeless at maths
Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner) Posted Jul 29, 2003
69725:
-(6-9) x (7+2+5) = 42
Jeremy
I'm hopeless at maths
Baron Grim Posted Jul 29, 2003
I guess I always tried to work from the front. I never noticed the 14 at the end nor it's significance for this problem.
Wow
Thanks tons Jeremy.
I'm hopeless at maths
Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat Posted Jul 30, 2003
I'm hopeless at maths
Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner) Posted Jul 30, 2003
That's not really cleverness. It's just routine ...
After all, 42 is nothing else than 6 x 7, 3 x 14, 2 X 21, etc. ...
Once you have found a way to get 14 out of some of the digits, you just need to build 3 from the other ones ... (just to name one example) ...
I'm hopeless at maths
Baron Grim Posted Jul 30, 2003
Yea, I was basically trying a very haphazard approach of going like.
"let's see... six times nine is fifty four, erm... minus seven is... forty seven... no that won't work... six PLUS nine is...."
If I had thought of it more as a puzzle than a maths problem I probably would have got it. When I do a "puzzle" I've trained myself to break the puzzle down before I go any farther, which if I had done with this I think I might of gotten it.
Jeremy
I'm hopeless at maths
Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat Posted Aug 1, 2003
I'm just lazy, but I was approaching it in much the same way as you.
I'm hopeless at maths
Potholer Posted Sep 4, 2003
CZ, an alternative for you is
6+9*(7+2-5) => 42
Pinwheel could go for
sqrt( 196*(7-(5-7)) )
I'm hopeless at maths
Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit) Posted Sep 30, 2003
Nah can't have sqrt...
But There is a 42ism in a DNA Stylee for CZ...
69725 = 6*9 + (7-2-5) = 6*9 = 42 in a DNA Stylee...
Welcome CZ and PP to the Club, take your seat (or your Pogo Stick if you'd prefer) at the DoQuaDecahedric table...
I'm hopeless at maths
Baron Grim Posted Sep 30, 2003
As you probably already know, 6*9=42 in base13. So I'm good with that.
Count Zero, 6*9+(7-2-5)=42(base13)
I'm hopeless at maths
AK - fancy that! Posted Sep 30, 2003
But you can use a square root, that one there was especially cool, but still square root is a perfectly good operation I think...
I'm hopeless at maths
Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit) Posted Oct 3, 2003
Square root is Number to the power of 1/2 ... So if you've got either a couple of numbers to make 1/2 with or a 5 (to turn into .5) you can do it... Otherwise you could say "Oh 2 cubed is 8, so that's alright..."...
(e.g. U000001 could then be (0!+0!+0!)! x ((0!+0!)[cubed]-1)=42...
But you just can't pluck numbers out of nowhere...
I'm hopeless at maths
Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit) Posted Oct 3, 2003
Oh, BTW correction to my earlier post... The table isn't DoQuaDecaHedric its DoQuaDecagonic.... My mistake
I'm hopeless at maths
Baron Grim Posted Oct 3, 2003
I am assuming that a DoQuaDecagonic table is 42 sided yes.
Since I have Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia that gave me the shivers.
Count Zero
I'm hopeless at maths
AK - fancy that! Posted Oct 3, 2003
It may be fear of long words but I think its just a joke...
I'm hopeless at maths
Baron Grim Posted Oct 3, 2003
Uh Oh... now my Geliophobia is kicking in.
Count Zero, who finds the phobialist website quite amusing. I'll stop now.
I'm hopeless at maths
AK - fancy that! Posted Oct 3, 2003
I found it 2 years ago and have been amused ever since. However I don't know what Geliophobia is.
I printed it once, no idea where its gone to.
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
I'm hopeless at maths
- 1: Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat (Jun 28, 2003)
- 2: six7s (Jun 29, 2003)
- 3: Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat (Jun 30, 2003)
- 4: Baron Grim (Jul 29, 2003)
- 5: Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner) (Jul 29, 2003)
- 6: Baron Grim (Jul 29, 2003)
- 7: Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat (Jul 30, 2003)
- 8: Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner) (Jul 30, 2003)
- 9: Baron Grim (Jul 30, 2003)
- 10: Pinwheel Pearl, GURU, Post Book Reviewer, Muse of Japanese Maples and Owlatron's Thundercat (Aug 1, 2003)
- 11: Potholer (Sep 4, 2003)
- 12: Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit) (Sep 30, 2003)
- 13: Baron Grim (Sep 30, 2003)
- 14: AK - fancy that! (Sep 30, 2003)
- 15: Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit) (Oct 3, 2003)
- 16: Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit) (Oct 3, 2003)
- 17: Baron Grim (Oct 3, 2003)
- 18: AK - fancy that! (Oct 3, 2003)
- 19: Baron Grim (Oct 3, 2003)
- 20: AK - fancy that! (Oct 3, 2003)
More Conversations for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."