This is the Message Centre for Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Dinosaur star

Post 1

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Some 13 billion years ago in a distant cluster of stars, a planet
formed.
Remarkably it's still there, according to astronomers using the Hubble
Space Telescope.

smiley - erm

How do they know it's still there?

When we're looking into outer space, aren't we looking backwards in time? It could have disintergrated long ago....and we could be looking at its smiley - ghost

smiley - doh


Dinosaur star

Post 2

Tabitca

smiley - headhurts one for the philosophers I think ! How are you ? Hope things are going oksmiley - hug


Dinosaur star

Post 3

pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? |

Galaxy Babe going back into past while living in the future


Dinosaur star

Post 4

pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? |

oh yeah do not change too much in past, because we might suddendly have green ears!


Dinosaur star

Post 5

tom


or fly smiley - flyhi

but AGB can do that anyway being an archsmiley - angel


Dinosaur star

Post 6

Clelba

what's wrong with green ears?
^. .^
= ' =
Guru
CommunityArtist


Dinosaur star

Post 7

pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? |

nothing if you are French smiley - winkeye


Dinosaur star

Post 8

turvy (Fetch me my trousers Geoffrey...)

Hi Galaxy Babe

Is this the planet located in M4 and posted on the NASA web site?

(Here as it happens. http://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2003/jul/HQ_03234_Oldest_Planet.html or http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/2003/19/ which has more images. )

If it is then the light is only 5600 years old. I suppose it is conceivable that the planet has evapourated or something, but after 13 billion years and a supernova it is doing quite well!smiley - ok

turvysmiley - biggrin


Dinosaur star

Post 9

Sergeant Mushroom

smiley - blackcat

How do they know it's that old?smiley - erm


Dinosaur star

Post 10

turvy (Fetch me my trousers Geoffrey...)

Probably a slightly fishy smell and wrinkles!smiley - laugh


Dinosaur star

Post 11

Clelba

eww
^. .^
= ' =
Guru
CommunityArtist


Dinosaur star

Post 12

turvy (Fetch me my trousers Geoffrey...)

smiley - laughsmiley - laughsmiley - laugh

You have obviously never looked after old people!!


turvy


Dinosaur star

Post 13

Researcher 159112

isn't it something to do with time + space and light? Telling how old it is, I mean...?


Dinosaur star

Post 14

turvy (Fetch me my trousers Geoffrey...)

The simple answer is yes!

After that it gets harder to explain but stick with it...

1. Light (electromagnetic radiation) travels at approx. 300,000 kilometres per second. This is an absolute under normal conditions in this universe. Nothing can travel any faster and light goes no slower. A light year is the distance that light travels in 1 terrestrial year, so a light year is a distance measure that is also an expression of time. If something is 5600 light years away it is within our Galaxy, which is big, but the light from it takes 5600 years to reach us here on Earthsmiley - earth

2. The age of the planet and the star cluster it lives in is a different matter. This is measured in a number of ways and relies on the acceptance of the validity of a number of measures, the main one being the Hubble constant - the rate of expansion of space. Others include the type of stars found in the cluster which are assessed by studying their colour/temperature and the presence or absence of certain elements in their makeup (I don't mean mascara and lippy here!smiley - laugh) and how far away they are. Distance is estimated by looking for what are called 'standard candles' - Cepheid variable stars which vary in brightness very specifically with a direct correlation to redshift. Combine this with the Hubble constant and you have distance (a best guess anyway)

Globular clusters are generally full of smallish, oldish stars which formed early in the life of the Galaxy between 13 and 20 billion years ago (if you accept the Hubble constant as true). Hence the estimated age of the planet in question. This best guess is done by people who are a lot smarter that me so I tend to accept what they say.

there is still debate about the age of the Universe. Apparently there are stars in our Galaxy that are older than the best fit age of the Universe. smiley - huh

Hope you are still here?

turvy


Dinosaur star

Post 15

Researcher 159112

smiley - yikes I think I'll stick to sci-fi!


Dinosaur star

Post 16

turvy (Fetch me my trousers Geoffrey...)

Me too!smiley - ok


Dinosaur star

Post 17

Researcher 159112

I read A Brief History of Time, but it's a bit difficult. Not to understand, just to imagine things that are bigger than my existance... does that sound silly?


Dinosaur star

Post 18

turvy (Fetch me my trousers Geoffrey...)

No it's not silly at all.

When I read it I was filled with a sense of wonder and a need to discover more. It's just a sideline for me really - something I enjoy reading about along with Sci Fi and Harry Potter at the moment. I've just read 3 books by Alistair Reynolds (Revelation Space, Chasm City and Redemption Ark). Outstanding!

There are lots of books out there that help you to get to grips with the Cosmology. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal has written some good stuff as has John Gribben.

turvy


Dinosaur star

Post 19

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

smiley - cdouble

"Apparently there are stars in our Galaxy that are older than the best fit age of the Universe"

smiley - erm

I'm reminded of the chicken and the egg question.........but smiley - stars are really pretty to gaze at........and who cares how old they are?

smiley - flyhi


Dinosaur star

Post 20

pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? |

bit by bit the egg gets legs

an african saying


Key: Complain about this post