h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

So, once again, the satanic has struck at the heart of our great capital city. Praise the Lord, for this time they were stopped in the path, and I would like to congratulate the police for depleting their numbers today, even if only by one.

So how can such outrages be prevented in the future? Are we forevermore under threat from this deeply evil and outrightly satanic form of Islam?

The answer is, I fear, yes. This is all part of the run up to the last days, as foretold in Daniel, Ezekiel and Revelation. Watch out for the beginning of the temple and the emergence of the antichrist. It cannot be far away.

In the meantime, we should impose an immediate blanket ban on immigration and scrap this ridiculous Human rights Act which says we cannot lock out enemies up until after they commit an atrosity against us! Prayers for our police and intelligence services and political leaders are also particularly needed at this time. Let us not forget the power of prayer.

But ultimately, Jesus Christ alone has the answer. I think we are seeing the beginnings of a great Christian revival - particularly in certain islamic countries like Pakistan and Iraq where new churches are prospering and bringing new members through their doors each Sunday by the dozen. That truly is something to be thankful for, and we can only pray that the number of converts continues to grow - just like in the early church were we are told how the Lord added to their number daily!

Come, Lord Jesus, pour out your spirit...

"this deeply evil and outrightly satanic form of Islam?"

Are there forms of Islam that, in your opinion (for that is all that you ever voice) aren't deeply evil and outrightly satanic then?

"In the meantime, we should impose an immediate blanket ban on immigration "

After all, all of the bombers were immigrants, were they not.
Does a blanket ban on immigration mean that a white, Christian American would be refused entry?

Still, you seem to be pretty good Tory party material, although you may find UKIP, Veritas or the BNP might be woorth a look.

In response to your first post, all forms of Islam are, by default, satanic. Just like Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Catholicism, Mormonism, etc., since that Bible tells us that that which is not of God is of the Devil. But there are, I believe, degrees of evil, and I accept that the vast majority of muslims are peaceable people who object to the acts of this depraved minority.

Stopping immigration is simply a sensible security precaution in this current environment. I don't see the problem with letting in a white, Christian, American as white, Christian, Americans haven't been the ones who have been planting bombs on our tube system. So, necessarily, all additional security measures should be proportionate and targeted. Some will say that smells of racism, but I call it sensible security.

I resent the implication that I would be better suited to one of those parties you mention. UKIP and Veritas are one-issue protest parties, managed by disgruntled political has-beens which will soon fade into oblivion. The BNP are a bunch of racist football holligans with nothing better to do in their free time other than to drink lager and beat up black people. They have no role in a modern, democratic Britain. But the Tories, on the other hand, providing they choose the right leader, are set to become the government again very soon indeed. Task number 1 will be to scrap this ridiculous Human rights act, which has kept Cherie raking in a six figure salary (if not more) while terrorists and criminals run riot on our streets.

"I don't see the problem with letting in a white, Christian, American as white, Christian, Americans haven't been the ones who have been planting bombs on our tube system. "

Ah! So based on that the only people you would block with your blanket ban would be people of Pakistani or Jamaican origin? Would you exclude a Pakistani Christian? Or a white American Muslim. Or an Australian atheist of Chinese origin? Please tell us more abut your blanket immigration ban. Just who is covered by the blanket and who isn't?


"I resent the implication that I would be better suited to one of those parties you mention. UKIP and Veritas are one-issue protest parties, managed by disgruntled political has-beens which will soon fade into oblivion. The BNP are a bunch of racist football holligans with nothing better to do in their free time other than to drink lager and beat up black people. They have no role in a modern, democratic Britain. But the Tories, on the other hand, providing they choose the right leader, are set to become the government again very soon indeed. "

I have real trouble distinguishing between the four parties mentioned. The Tories have more money and members, but that appears to be about the only difference.

"I accept that the vast majority of muslims are peaceable people who object to the acts of this depraved minority. "


These would be the ones that are mildy satanic and only slightly evil, yes?

Sounds like you are in tune with this old post from the magnificent Harry Hutton:

http://chasemeladies.blogspot.com/2004/05/i-agree-with-abu-hamza-up-to-point.html

>>The answer is, I fear, yes. This is all part of the run up to the last days, as foretold in Daniel, Ezekiel and Revelation. Watch out for the beginning of the temple and the emergence of the antichrist. It cannot be far away.<<

Just out of curiosity, Sam,

(i) Are you going to mention this belief to the electorate if you ever stand for parliament? Do you agree that it would be disingenuous* not to?

(ii) What is the point of entering politics if Jesus is soon going to return and establish his kingdom?

* http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disingenuous

>

>Americans haven't been the ones who have been planting bombs on our tube system.

No but they have supported the IRA.

No but they have bombed their own people like Timothy McVeigh (a christian no less) has.

>But the Tories, on the other hand, providing they choose the right leader, are set to become the government again very soon indeed.

So that is a christian leader, not a jewish one then. Sounds like racism to me.

One thing I asked you a while ago, was when you said that satan would appear as a angel to form the other religions, how do you know that he didn't appear as Jesus to con people away from the Jewish religion you didn't have an answer for that.

I would like to congratulate the police for depleting their numbers today, even if only by one.
As of now (Sat 7.54pm) it looks like the police haven't depleted the terrorists by one but may possibly have depleted the innocent bystanders by one.

That remains to be seen. He may well have had nothing to do with the attempted bombing, but that is not to say he is "innocent" by any means. We are not in possession of all the facts, but certainly those which we are aware of suggests that this individual was up to no good.

We are not in possession of all the facts, but certainly those which we are aware of suggests that this individual was up to no good.
You have absolutely no clue do you?

He may have had a bomb attached to him. He may have had a few ounces of cannabis. He may have thought the /plain/ clothes policemen were a gang out to bash muslims. We just don't know.

Is being "up to no good" really a good reason to get a man on the ground and shoot him five times?

Why don't you shut up until we are in possession of the facts for once? If it turns out he had a bomb strapped around his waist you can feel justified. If it turns out not, I hope you feel totally ashamed of what you have written here today.

Imagine the scene - you are walking through a city where most people speak a language you do not understand. Suddenly, agroup of angry men with gus start shouting at you. Naturally, you run away.

As a punishment for your fear, the angry men shoot you five times in the head.

Imagine further that there really is an afterlife, from where you read this thread, and see the reactions of your family when they read similar comments by other people.

You really are a pillock, Sam.

<>

From this week's New Scientist:

"...many of the suicide bombers in Lebanon in the 1980s were from secular christian backgrounds."

What answers, Sam?

Time for more education, Sam: A3982511.

Sam,

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4711021.stm

He was an electrician from Brazil. I hope you're feeling a certain amount of shame and that you've learned that when you assert an opinion on something, it is better to know the facts.

Bet Sam will say they are not his type of 'christians'. Of course baptists have never done any thing bad, apart from some of them supporting Hitler.

Here is a quote from Martin Luther...

Martin Luther, after admonishing Philip of Hesse to tell a "good stout lie," defends his advice in the following words:
"What would it matter if, for the sake of the Christian Church, one were to tell a big lie?"

Sound like Sam follows this idea regularly.

Yeesh...glad you hadn't made it to cabinet minister by the the time the kids and I were filling out our residency applications