h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

FM: The two Entries in question are hardly 'commendably balanced' - they were written by Josh the Genius (remember him?), which sparked off a long, *very* acrimonius discussion, which began much like the one that is taking place now...

In the end, the only solution was to take Josh's Entries and turn them into EG Entries, linked to Hoovooloo's Entry on why it was a load of rubbish, and several other Entries in what became an old-style University Project.

The two Entries to which evoskepsis is referring (actually, two parts of the same, long Entry) make no claim to be balanced in any way - they are simply the Creationist viewpoint, with links to Entries on Evolution.

This is why I suggested in my earlier post that we take this debate elsewhere - it's all been done before, and it got nasty...

if it got returned to entry, and gnomon's debuning of this was attached as a conversation thread, it would be far more fitting than having a discusion of in on peer review.

Surly the point of this forum is to suggest changes and improvments to articles written for the EG that are suitable under the writing guidelines, we've agreeed that this isn't suitable.

*Creeps in, hoping no-one will throw anything at her*

Hi evoskepsis, Welcome to h2g2, and Welcome to Peer Review

I think the guys have made it crystal clear that your Entry is not suitable for Peer Review.

Hope this 'hiccup' won't put you off writing another Entry within the Writing-Guidelines

In the interest of keeping Peer review tidy, please click PeerReview find your Entry on the list, you'll see either a X or Remove link, click that, it will remove your Entry back to your Space.



Emmily

Full time job isn't it Emmily - picking up the pieces after us Grumpies have been at it!

The reason I have waded in with my size twelves is because I don't like to see PR being abused this way, and in the hope that perhaps people like this will get the message eventually.

Move back to entry proposed. Seconder?

Seconded. And well booted, FM!

I'm accustomed to grumpiness Whisky, I happily live with a grumpy old man, and you know what; the grumpier he gets, the more I laugh.

what big you have FM













FM, I just resist that tease.
Emmily

Well, you know what they say about men with big feet, Emmily?

I certainlly do FM it means that they have difficullty buying 'off the shelf' socks and shoes, they trip over their feet easier, have I missed anything

Emmily

Yes. We stub our toes more often.

Ormy (Size 12 )

And what are the odds of that happening....?

Oops, missed a page of posts. Please excuse my irrevant comment

didn't propose a move to entry a page ago ?

oh well

I'll send the email.

'have I missed anything?'

You couldn't muss this, believe me Emmily...

Hmmmmmmm I believe men with big are also known to......................................................brag
a bit like fishermen, explaining the 'one that got away'

Emmily

Problem 3 'Gene recombination confounded by gene mutation' mentioned in the Evoskepsis contribution, is supported by the article "The Evolutionary Dynamics of Digital and Nucleotide Codes: A Mutation Protection Perspective", published in 2011 in the peer-reviewed Open Evolution Journal. See: http://bit.ly/wzr6ju

This post has been removed.