A Conversation for Discussions Related to the Lifetime Ban of Researcher AWOL

Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 1

The H2G2 Editors

Post statements supporting the banning of Researcher AWOL here.


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 2

~~Insomniac.Vampire~~

hmmm looks like your fighting a losing battle to me, if you really want him gone, you'll have to offer us smiley - 2centssmiley - 2centssmiley - 2centssmiley - 2centssmiley - 2cents lots of it, make it enough for a pc and you got my vote smiley - biggrin lmao



smiley - fullmoon


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 3

Hoovooloo

Signing up for another account while on a ban -> another ban.

Signing up for another account while on a TP for life ban -> life ban.

Using that account to post in the "don't ban" thread, just so EVERYONE knows you've done it -> pointing and laughing at the thick Yorkshire t**t.

Open and shut case, seems to me...

H.


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 4

Rho

Precisely what Hoovooloo said. Creating new accounts while banned, pending a lifetime ban, is inexcusable.

RhoMuNuQ


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 5

Post Team

F19815?thread=304316
F19815?thread=298379

... just the tip of the iceberg seeing as the offensive bits on the homespace have now been removed

Ban

smiley - thepost


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 6

AK - fancy that!

From what I've seen you have my vote...


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 7

Hoovooloo

In case anyone's interested, said thick Yorkshire t**t, as though he hadn't already cooked his own goose, has actually now posted abuse to my own space.

Not literate abuse, obviously, but that pretty much goes without saying. He's labouring under the illusion I'm Scottish (or, as he charmingly put it, "scotish") and proceeded to heap abuse on Scots in general.

Bless.

Note to h2g2 staff - you have this tosser's email, or failing that, IP address. You therefore know who his internet service provider is. You are therefore in a position to make an official, BBC-headed-notepaper type complaint to them about the abuse he's perpetrating using their systems.

You could get his entire internet access cut off! Wouldn't that be cool? smiley - cool

Even better, if he's logging on from work - you could get the c**t fired! Even better!

Of course, I'm not suggesting you do that right away. Let him post another message here, maybe two, before you get in touch with his access providers...

H.


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 8

Post Team

U240552 /1 on AWOL 2 get life time barring...h2g2 fiddle the votes,,, :o)

Another one!

smiley - thepost


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 9

J

Aye
Not much to be said that others haven't smiley - erm

smiley - blacksheep


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 10

GreyDesk

AWOL? No I think not, you can go *with* our leave. Bye-bye...


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 11

Mistdancer-X-sporadically coherent

U244980

Wild guess?


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 12

Hoovooloo

More abuse has been posted to a number of conversations I'm in. I'm assuming it's abuse - someone else has yikesed it. Shame really - illiterate moronic rantings are usually good for a giggle. The great thing is it's still politically correct and acceptable to point and laugh at people for being thick.

So... since the abuse continues, and since the w**ker is opening accounts at will, it seems time to fire off a .bbc.co.uk email from the staff to his service providers, requesting that he be prevented from continuing this spamming of the site. Mention of the new European laws against spamming might be in order - but I doubt it will be necessary. Most reputable service providers take abuse by their users seriously, and cut them off at the first suggestion of improper behaviour.

Go on, Editors - do the internet a favour and cull this smiley - tit

H.


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 13

Jab [Since 29th November 2002]

This is NOT a vote for YES...

F149687?thread=317563&post=4119204

smiley - erm


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 14

Wøñkø

Do ban.


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 15

im forever losing things but hey it could be worse

smiley - applausesmiley - biggrin


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 16

SEF

I still haven't seen enough evidence to justify the original ban given the people who are allowed to remain. However, I'm not saying the evidence doesn't exist - especially since my general impression of AWOL from the few times I have randomly come across posts was that they have always been trouble-making rather than constructive.

Meanwhile it seems pretty clear that AWOL has no intention of respecting the suspension period while a ban is considered. So if the ban is justified at all then it should be upheld for that additional reason. NB U247789 seems to be another duplicate account (unless it is someone's warped idea of a joke). The PS and these posts seem to be admissions of guilt: 817?thread=8172233" >F122233?thread=321977&skip=3&show=2


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 17

Original_One

Researcher AWOL has been banned from h2g2 for life. This is due to the amount of offensive content posted (and since removed) to h2g2 since April:


How sad is this site,,lol,,


my heart breaks smiley - smiley


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 18

SEF

I might as well carry on collecting evidence of multiple identities being used to post during a ban even though I still can't say the original ban was justified: U247912 claims "aka AWOL" in F107134?thread=322059


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 19

J

>>my heart breaks

Well now we have a smiley for it smiley - brokenheart!

smiley - blacksheep


Ban Researcher AWOL

Post 20

~~Insomniac.Vampire~~

Sef
===

another valid point! least you are basing your opinions on factual evidence you are gathering rather than just jumping in and commenting on something you know absolutely nothing about
(rolls eyes at some of the previous posts in this thread)!



smiley - fullmoon


Key: Complain about this post