h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

...They elect him again damn it. He has the popular vote according to the TV, meaning that whilst he can technically still lose the presidency, more people wanted him.

Now this may be just myself here, but ill go out on a limb anyway, but all ive heard from any Americans ive spoken to is that they hate Bush (Bad mood, no pun intended) and want Kerry. Now this has been the general feeling i get everywhere. No one wants Bush.

So why is it that the majority still voted for him (so far)? Its extremely difficult to have a positive veiw of America as a Nation when such a violent and self destructive human is put in power for a second term.


Apart from all that something else got me thinking. It was numbers on the American military and ill try and recall as much as i can remember. 1 in 6 people have a relative in the Army. The American army (including reserves) numbered over three million. It has bases pretty much all over the world.

Now lets imagine for a minute that this is the 18th century. You have the world largest army, with bases across the world. You have the fastest growing economy of any country. At home you have complete control over all areas of government. You could, in theory, take over the world at the drop of a hat.

Think about it and feel scared too. Its not like Bush couldnt do it either. Hes got the missiles to bomb Iran, Korea (get North and South, saves time) and china to desolate wastes, and the star wars programme (and the rest too) to defend against aggressors back.

Whilst this hopefully wont happen, I cant help shake the image from my mind of American troops advancing through Swinton towards entrenchments around the rugby pitch...

According to Yahoo Kerry's conceded

I watched something on Sky about the illuminati. Its like the most powerful group of people in the world (only a theory no one has any proof) and they supoose to have control over everything. The point is that Bush and Blair are thought to be members, it makes you think about the attack on Iraq, people have a theory that the purpose was to get control of Iraqs oil supplies and the twin towers incident and the threat of nuclear weapons was only a excuse (they never found any weapons) If they have these oil supplies, it makes Bush and Blair powerful people.

Yes but if that was true wouldnt they, with all there power, simply smuggle in some nuclear weapons, and thus have proof and make them seem better - allowing both Bush and Blair secured seats. The missing explosives and WMD's both make the leaders look bad.

Theres a large cooperation called halibuton (iirc) that has people like Bush's dad in as well as many other people connected with the Bush's and the Saudi's. They deal in arms and munitions.

It just depends what Bush does now. He could bring back conscription, creating jobs and using foreign oil to pay the troops. Foreign oil from say.. i dont know.. Iran...

Sorry also fogot to mention the most important thing.

You heard rite reef, Kerry conceeded. Which annoys me like hell because edwards said every voted counted. I was up and watched him say that and was convinced that here were two people who could be let near the red buttons.

We're doomed

Dunno actually, it depends on how big Bush's testicles are *skates on the knife edge*

See if America attacks Iran, the saudis will be p*ssed. And Saudis own a 7th of the country in one form or another (mainly oil). Now Iran and Saudi Arabia have enough money, people, and by the looks of it weapons, too put up a decent fight. Again this causes more problems, as by having a sustained war more people and more dangerous weapons are dragged in...

Maybe thats what America needs though, a proper good thrashing. An axis of Europe and other states... could almost bring america to its knees if it worked quick enough. Its worrying when you think about it, but imagine Bush during the cold war. You really think America troops wouldnt have been on the move?

If they did smuggle weapons into Iraq (or wherever they would attack) would that cause too much suspicion? And remember Iraqs not under there power and this organisation is suppose to be top secret, even people who work closest to the president wouldnt know. and there the convenient sucide of that Doctor who wrote the report sugesting there were weapons in Iraq.

Plus with all this power the leaders would have as part of this group, popularity is hardly important.

But you'd still need underlings to do such things, and underlings tend to run off to the press from time to time...

Well in this programme on sky they said that people who attempted to expose the illuminati were often threatened with there life. People who would carry out orders from bush and Blair would be illuminati members themselves, who if they expose the illuminati are also threatened. Im not saying this theory is true but its interesting. after all who wants to become president or priminister purely in the interests of the country. We're suppose to be a 'democracy' but how much propaganda do we get thrown in our faces?

You do know that the Illuminati are also said to be lizards living underground right? Something they didn't mention on that Sky One Conspiracies programme.

http://www.davidicke.com/icke/articles/illuminati.html


There we go.

Ah the lizard people. I wonder if the bloodlines thing is correct though. That would be quiet remarkable...

I love how it is in the lower forth dimension.

The forth dimension being time.

Length, breadth, depth, time and space.

Oh no its not! You only think that because its what they want you to think!

Unlike standing outside vaguely shaped owl buildings.

I can't believe you're considering the possibility Bush is a lizard. Look at the guy, he's a rodent!

I thought chimp.

Hes clearly a monkey. I mean look at the ears.