A Conversation for Hurricanes

A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 21

Will

It's up for some of us, and down for others. Personally, I haven't seen any error messages since Wednesday smiley - smiley. It's one of those YMMV things.

While we're on the subject of acronyms, what does TWIMC mean?


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 22

Elentari

What do either of those mean? Incidentally, I'd already pressed "post message" when I spotted it, so I just changed it quickly and clicked it again.

Are you sure I can have it?


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 23

Will

YMMV = Your Mileage May Vary = It may work differently for you


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 24

Researcher 219823


I now have no idea. Just think of it as something wonderfully witty though sharply barbed and now lost to humanity and you will be at least half right.


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 25

Will

I looked on the 'net and found out.

To Whom It May Concern

Robert (smiley - yawn)


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 26

Researcher 219823


Meanwhile back on Earth....

Have you noticed that the original poster (Prof. Burnham) was the teacher of the preppie that submitted this magnificent prose?

Probably got it this far as an encouragement. If you look on the Prof's page, his posts centre on the work of his pupils. I suppose desperate times require desperate measures. -We don't know what yardstick the kids aught to be measured by.

I don't suppose he'll be back too, neither -until next time. On the other hand, if he is a North American he might think something up with the British idea of a service here was directed at him. Once he was not able to get on a few times he probably stopped trying.

I can't help thinking that the server they are using on here is the one they gave Jimmy Hill or Desmond Lynham early in their careers with the Beeb. I don't suppose it was much use on Match of the Day then too neither!


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 27

Will

Was there anything relevent in that post, 'cause I can't find anything.

Robert (smiley - yawn)


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 28

Elentari

So is it OK for me to have it or do you want to finish it? It's OK if you do, I have a whole list of things to write about (read: to get around to at some stage)...


A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 29

Researcher 219823

For goodness sake girl, I don't want it. Since it is the original work of a newbie, I am not able to say what its value is -to me at least.


Peer Review: A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 30

2 of 3

Would anyone object if I attempted to work on this article to make it suitable for the guide??


Peer Review: A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 31

Sea Change

It looks like Prof. Burnham has elvised.

You might try signing on as The Grim Reaper to see if you can get any Scouts to get it put into the Flea Market.


Peer Review: A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 32

Otto Fisch ("Stop analysing Strava.... and cut your hedge")


I'd recommend dropping a message at the original author's personal space, saying that you'd like to take the entry on and develop it for the EG, do they mind, and that you'll credit them as a researcher.

Then take whatever of the text is useful and add the original author to the researcher's list, and develop the article. It doesn't have to go into the flea market....

Let me know if I can be of any assistance...

Otto


Peer Review: A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 33

Elentari

As far as I'm concerned, you can have it. Good luck! smiley - smiley


Peer Review: A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 34

2 of 3

I did as u said. Took the text, developed it and credited the original guy. As far as I could tell, he didn't have a proper page so I could leave him a message.

I didn't actually keep much of his stuff but he's still credited as the author and me as the editor.

Its now in peer review. Take a look.

2/3


Peer Review: A982398 - Hurricanes

Post 35

Elentari

I have, and commented. It's very good.


Procedural niceties

Post 36

Sea Change

Thanks, Otto, I didn't know that once a piece was listed as reviewable and submitted for review it could be taken from the author in absentia. In the past, there wasn't any policy about this in the past except the general H2G2 one of assumed proprietorship by the author. I remember at least one past case where someone copied over and modified an original submitted piece, and the original author came back (how he knew this after elvising, I do not remember) and in the ensuing PR aggro the piece never did go through.


Procedural niceties

Post 37

2 of 3

IN my case if you look a the original and then look at mine, you couldn't tell it was the same article.

Sure I did start with his . . . but I had to flesh it out. And I also got rid of a fair bit of his stuff in the process.

Also none of the stuff he had there was 'his' per se, its facts. And since I had to re-write it to fit my 'style' I'd say the article was all mine.

I don't mind crediting him, and I have. I would've done the article whether or not he'd done one.

2/3


Key: Complain about this post