A Conversation for Douglas Adams Versus H2G2 Editorial Policy

OLD policy

Post 1

abbi normal "Putting on the Ritz" with Dr Frankenstein

Is the old policy around somewhere to read and compare? I would not know the differences in policy, having been here steadily a few short months.

smiley - disco


OLD policy

Post 2

PQ

There has been no change in policy...anyone can create a guide entry on any subject so long as it follows the house rules.

If an entry is submitted to peer review for entry in the Editied Guide - the official "encyclopedia" section of the guide - it is expected to follow the writing guidelines which include a ban on first person references (so that edited entries can be updated by other researchers if the entry becomes out of date) and that entries be balanced.


OLD policy

Post 3

abbi normal "Putting on the Ritz" with Dr Frankenstein

""ban on first person references (so that edited entries can be updated by other researchers if the entry becomes out of date)""


Oh well, I see why now! I did wonder about that! smiley - boing

smiley - disco


OLD policy

Post 4

a girl called Ben

I think Abbi and Pencil Queen are probably already aware of the debates going on about creating a parallel guide - currently being referred to as the Underguide.

A good starting point for these conversations is here: A943670

There is also an MSN group discussing the subject here: http://groups.msn.com/TheH2G2Underguide

Come on over and join the debates. Unfortunately they are scatterd all over the place. We need to make a list of the threads, really.

B


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more