A Conversation for Updating on h2g2
-
- 1
- 2
-
Why not put the old version into a new conversation under the new entry?
Martin Harper Posted Jun 7, 2002
That's not exactly user-friendly, is it? And I still don't see why anyone (except eds, sub-eds) would want to read the out-of-date version. There's been no clamour for that as a result of Mikey's updates, has there?
Why not put the old version into a new conversation under the new entry?
Bogie Posted Jun 7, 2002
No clamour!... this is just a "what if" question!
B.
Why not put the old version into a new conversation under the new entry?
IMSoP - Safely transferred to the 5th (or 6th?) h2g2 login system Posted Jun 8, 2002
Personally, I still think some form of official archived version would be the only solution to this problem. Other than that, delete it. As mentioned here, putting it into a conversation would render it unusable anyway, thus defying the point of archiving in the first place...
[IMSoP]
Why not put the old version into a new conversation under the new entry?
World Service Memoryshare team Posted Jul 9, 2002
Hi Everyone,
Sorry I've let this discussion slip over a number of weeks. I've now read all discussions here relating to the proposed updating scheme and I've responded in the forums of entry A760402 (an excellent entry summarising the themes raised here, put together by Frankie Roberto). It would be great to see you there and hear your thoughts on the next proposal.
Thanks
Anna 
Key: Complain about this post
-
- 1
- 2
-
Why not put the old version into a new conversation under the new entry?
More Conversations for Updating on h2g2
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."