A Conversation for Pop music in the late nineties and why selling your soul to satan is bad!

Selling ones soul to santa

Post 1

Eccentrica Gallumbits (I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.)

Have you never heard the saying "Satan has all the best tunes"?
I think it is far more likely to be the work of the evil smiley - santa


Selling ones soul to santa

Post 2

lonemoose

<SMILEY TYPE="nahnah"/>Actually I've got to disagree to the soiling of Santas name. my reasons are as follows:<SMILEY TYPE="snowman"/>

<SMILEY TYPE="doh"/>Santa is known as a kind, giving and generous person, and to me this says that it is highly unlikely that santa has schizophrenic tendencies to give generously and selflessly one moment and then immediately afterward inflict the audio equivalent of a mortal wound by writing sub-standard melodramatic gibberish that through his minions he convinces weak minded fools to purchase in exchange for overly large portions of peoples hard earned money.

<SMILEY TYPE="silly"/>I don't think santa has the infrastructure or vindictivness to subject the world to so much pain and suffering.

<SMILEY TYPE="clown"/>If Santa is responsible for rubbish pop-music, then why does he release all of this worst and unlistenable ditties at christmas (a time that is generally associated with him), it would effectively mean that he is his own worst enemy. It would make more sense that Satan, who is actually good & gods worst enemy would resent the fact that people don't celebrate his birthday and hence would unleash all his wrath in the form of Cliff Richardesque christmas 'hits' at the time of his arch enemies' birthday, namely christmas.

<SMILEY TYPE="martianfrown"/>Santa is generally regarded as a figment of the imagination (I guess this argument also holds for Satan & God), and as the threat of awful, lame, manufactured and badly over-produced music is very much real, I think santa can rest assured that he will not be bought to trial in the near future for his crimes against humanity.

<SMILEY TYPE="nahnah"/>On the pro-side of your comment there is the fact that observations of santa have yielded the fact that santa is in fact a highly irresponsible person. He has no real fixed address, except at christmas. He doesn't pay taxes & tends not to vote. He has a job that only requires 1 day of work a year, I mean who does he think hes kidding. Does he really think that he can claim unemployment benefit for 364 days of the year and justify this with 1 day of unpaid voluntary work. I think that it is highly likely that santa has 'other' undeclared sources of income and therein lies the possibility that santa is in fact writing and earning money from rubbish pop songs on the sly!


Selling ones soul to santa

Post 3

lonemoose

<SMILEY TYPE="nahnah"/>Actually I've got to disagree to the soiling of Santas name. my reasons are as follows:<SMILEY TYPE="snowman"/>

<SMILEY TYPE="doh"/>Santa is known as a kind, giving and generous person, and to me this says that it is highly unlikely that santa has schizophrenic tendencies to give generously and selflessly one moment and then immediately afterward inflict the audio equivalent of a mortal wound by writing sub-standard melodramatic gibberish that through his minions he convinces weak minded fools to purchase in exchange for overly large portions of peoples hard earned money.

<SMILEY TYPE="silly"/>I don't think santa has the infrastructure or vindictivness to subject the world to so much pain and suffering.

<SMILEY TYPE="clown"/>If Santa is responsible for rubbish pop-music, then why does he release all of this worst and unlistenable ditties at christmas (a time that is generally associated with him), it would effectively mean that he is his own worst enemy. It would make more sense that Satan, who is actually good & gods worst enemy would resent the fact that people don't celebrate his birthday and hence would unleash all his wrath in the form of Cliff Richardesque christmas 'hits' at the time of his arch enemies' birthday, namely christmas.

<SMILEY TYPE="martianfrown"/>Santa is generally regarded as a figment of the imagination (I guess this argument also holds for Satan & God), and as the threat of awful, lame, manufactured and badly over-produced music is very much real, I think santa can rest assured that he will not be bought to trial in the near future for his crimes against humanity.

<SMILEY TYPE="nahnah"/>On the pro-side of your comment there is the fact that observations of santa have yielded the fact that santa is in fact a highly irresponsible person. He has no real fixed address, except at christmas. He doesn't pay taxes & tends not to vote. He has a job that only requires 1 day of work a year, I mean who does he think hes kidding. Does he really think that he can claim unemployment benefit for 364 days of the year and justify this with 1 day of unpaid voluntary work. I think that it is highly likely that santa has 'other' undeclared sources of income and therein lies the possibility that santa is in fact writing and earning money from rubbish pop songs on the sly!


Selling ones soul to santa

Post 4

Piawacket

So you think Santa And Satan have got a little money making scheme going on , that fools all idots in to buying their unsolisited rubbish , they call pop ??


Selling ones soul to santa

Post 5

lonemoose

I think you have summed up my sentiments quite well.


Selling ones soul to santa

Post 6

Eccentrica Gallumbits (I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.)


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more