A Conversation for Sex verus Cybersex
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
spook Started conversation Nov 29, 2001
http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/A660476
A look at both Sex and Cybersex. What does everyone think?
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Evil Zombie Strider Posted Nov 30, 2001
I think you want your title to be "Sex vs. [or versus] Cybersex."
There are several typos. You might want to simply copy this text and put it into the spell/grammer checker on your word processor.
Additionally, I would make your "what is sex" section have a link to the "sex" entry,
http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/A5176
as well as making your "what is cybersex" section have a link to the "cybersex" entry:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/A375527
With that in mind, your entry is now very short. Perhaps you could elaborate on each pro/con, rather than try to fit lots of information into a one-liner. Definately elaborate more on the psychological effects/reprecutions of cyber vs. real (this falls under the "can it be special" point.)
As with anything I say, feel free to ignore me.
-Strider
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
HappyDude Posted Nov 30, 2001
& use a to credit the dictionary you took the quote from.
And a popular on-line dictionary gave me the following defination of Cybersex
"Sexual activity or arousal through communication by computer"
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Nov 30, 2001
Your definition of Sex is a very limited one. By your definition, gay people can't have sex with each other at all! And you are also omitting oral sex between man and woman. It looks like you're getting a kick out of spelling out words like penis and vagina in big letters. Instead of that, try and come up with some sort of a general description of sex which includes most of the things people think of as sex.
Your description of cybersex implies that it is cold and clinical: you say you are unlikely to get an orgasm. But anything that causes sexual arousal can lead to an orgasm. It's surprising that you haven't mentioned masturbation at all: this must surely be an important part of cybersex.
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Dr Hell Posted Nov 30, 2001
I agree with the said above. The entry as it stands now is very thin, and from a personal point of view. It doesn't add anything new to the already existing edited entries.
Bye,
HELL
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Evil Zombie Strider Posted Nov 30, 2001
One more thing that I noticed: By your sex definition, if the man does not ejaculate it isn't sex.
-Strider
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Nireena Posted Dec 7, 2001
A couple of points:
An earlier poster asked "Why is pregnancy necessarily a disadvantage?" Perhaps you could amend that line to "unwanted pregnancy".
I agree that the definition of sex given is too narrow. That's why there's a debate about whether or not having cybersex while in a relationship with someone can be considered cheating. The ethics of cybersex might be a subtopic to explore in your article.
Overall, it's a good start but needs more depth.
Cheers.
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Orcus Posted Dec 7, 2001
One thing I noticed was that the person who wrote that definition of sex clearly wasnt' very good at it.
One stroke and he's done by the sound of it
More seriously I also think the article is a bit thin for inclusion in the edited guide. Not sure how to improve it though
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
Martin Harper Posted Dec 21, 2001
Seems to me that this would be a good basis for a collaborative entry or talking point of some kind - but I have to agree that it's a little thin as is. The question of what is sex and what is cybersex will be amply remedied by a link to the existing Edited Entries (neither of which are particularly good, but that's a seperate issue).
The comparison between the two, which is the real point of the entry, is going to need a bit more work, though - best of luck!
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
spook Posted Dec 21, 2001
I will be working on this again soon. If you would like to help work on this as a collaborative entry then I have already started a conversation up there.
spook
ps. thanks for all the points
Thread Moved
h2g2 auto-messages Posted Jan 17, 2002
Editorial Note: This conversation has been moved from 'Peer Review' to 'Sex verus Cybersex'. We're moving this Conversation in preparation for the forthcoming Review Forums system. To migrate over to the new system, we're making sure that there aren't any duplicates of entries in the various Review Forums, and as this is now in the Collaborative Writing Workshop at http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/F57152?thread=155475 we're moving this Conversation to the entry itself. Hope this makes sense! :-)
Key: Complain about this post
A660476 - Sex verus Cybersex
- 1: spook (Nov 29, 2001)
- 2: Evil Zombie Strider (Nov 30, 2001)
- 3: HappyDude (Nov 30, 2001)
- 4: HappyDude (Nov 30, 2001)
- 5: Gnomon - time to move on (Nov 30, 2001)
- 6: Dr Hell (Nov 30, 2001)
- 7: Evil Zombie Strider (Nov 30, 2001)
- 8: Nireena (Dec 7, 2001)
- 9: Orcus (Dec 7, 2001)
- 10: Martin Harper (Dec 21, 2001)
- 11: spook (Dec 21, 2001)
- 12: h2g2 auto-messages (Jan 17, 2002)
More Conversations for Sex verus Cybersex
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."