A Conversation for Project: Corsets
Vict Corsetry
Researcher 192596 Started conversation Apr 13, 2002
I'd love to write more, but surely the Victorian corset only stopped a Vict woman doing those things that Vict women did not do ?
A corset is restrictive by today's standards, it was "right and proper" by 19C standards?
Annie
Vict Corsetry
Phryne- 'Best Suppurating Actress' Posted Jun 10, 2003
oops... a year too late. faux pas... anyway:
I think they were more active than we like to imagine. There were special corsets for bicycle and horse-riding, maternity and exercise, for instance. I haven't come close enough to an actual period corset to judge how restrictive they are but modern ones aren't that different essentially, and even heavily-boned ones are comfortable. They don't stop you being active or even doing strenuous activities, you just have to move differently (the 'bunny-dip', for instance.) However it probably was 'right and proper' since they were more accustomed and adapted to wearing them, so did not view them as restrictive. However I would reckon that the many layers of extra underwear proved more of a hindrance than a corset.
Key: Complain about this post
Vict Corsetry
More Conversations for Project: Corsets
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."