A Conversation for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]

It's just too easy

Post 1

Ih-Dschieh

I want another number - I mean, come on - ending with 76? Well, here goes:

(10-7-2)*6/6*7*6=42

You haven't got a harder one for me?


It's just too easy

Post 2

Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired

Traveller in Time smiley - tit trying to find another
"(10-7-2)*6/6*7*6=42
Well apparently your mind is already flexed in calculations; try to find sme more smiley - smiley

As far as I know the current recors is combining three digits and reducing it back to 42.

We also have brilliant Researchers making poetry with their calculations < A557246 > and < A597314 > smiley - magic "


It's just too easy

Post 3

Ih-Dschieh

Of course I could include the two sixes inside the brackets and substitute them with +6-6 or *sqrt(6*6)...
Maybe I should try to avoid multiplying by 7 and 6 at the end i.e. get to 42 without the first six equalling 1 or 0? Might be a challenge.


It's just too easy

Post 4

Ih-Dschieh

I meant of course sqrt(6/6)
Oh well. Would't have happened if I still went to school smiley - winkeye


It's just too easy

Post 5

vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670)

It might be easy, but its also fun smiley - ok

Not sure about being a 'brilliant Researcher' though smiley - blush


It's just too easy

Post 6

Ih-Dschieh

Got one without using 7*6 at the end:

(1+0)*(7-2)+6*6+7-6=42

By the way - I think using inv tan is cheating because the division of the circle into 360 degrees is arbitrary and not universal.


It's just too easy

Post 7

vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670)

Well yes, InvTan is kinda cheating, so is adding loads of leading zeroes, but try telling that to the italics smiley - smiley.

Its all just creative bookkeeping - not everyone has 8 digits to play around with you know. When Argon0 first made the page, 5 or 6 digits was the norm.


It's just too easy

Post 8

Ih-Dschieh

May be interesting to know from which number on it's always possible to reach 42... How about a mathematical proof?


It's just too easy

Post 9

Potholer

For 1072667, the simplest answer seems to be
10-7+26+6+7

If you're using simple operations, (+-*\, combining digits, power, factorial and sqrt) I think there won't be a number above which all other numbers work, since 10^n will always fail.
maybe it'd work with some other conditions (minimum sum of digits?), but it might just not be a soluble question.


It's just too easy

Post 10

Ih-Dschieh

Well, you forgot my last 6... smiley - winkeye
But factorial saves every '0'
So 10000000 will work:

10*(0!+0!+0!+0!)+0!+0!=42

And has anybody ever used log?


It's just too easy

Post 11

Potholer

0! does feel like a bit of a cheat.

Even if it is defined to be 1 (for the purposes of certain calculations?) it's not really in the spirit of "Product of all the numbers between 1 and n, inclusive".


It's just too easy

Post 12

Ih-Dschieh

I'd say so too - but of course only because it doesn't concern me... smiley - biggrin


It's just too easy

Post 13

Malabarista - now with added pony

You can't use 7*6 anyway, because of course, 6*9=42, anything else is heresy smiley - winkeye


It's just too easy

Post 14

Ih-Dschieh

Yes, of course I know that. But what do you get if you multiply six by seven?smiley - ermsmiley - laugh


It's just too easy

Post 15

Malabarista - now with added pony

Well, 6*9 = 42 in base 13

If 6*7 = 42 in base 10, then in base 13 it would be:


1:1
2:2
3:3
...
9:9
10:a
11:b
12:c
13:10
14:11
...
22:19
23:1a
24:2b
25:2c
26:20
...
35:29
36:2a
37:2b
38:2c
39:30
40:31
41:32
42:33

so 6*7=33 smiley - geek

Or not.
smiley - winkeye


It's just too easy

Post 16

Ih-Dschieh

Oh, I understand base eight well enough - just forget about your thumbs. But base thirteen - I just wouldn't know which toes I'd have to use! smiley - rofl


Key: Complain about this post