A Conversation for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]
It's just too easy
Ih-Dschieh Started conversation Jan 8, 2008
I want another number - I mean, come on - ending with 76? Well, here goes:
(10-7-2)*6/6*7*6=42
You haven't got a harder one for me?
It's just too easy
Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired Posted Jan 8, 2008
Traveller in Time trying to find another
"(10-7-2)*6/6*7*6=42
Well apparently your mind is already flexed in calculations; try to find sme more
As far as I know the current recors is combining three digits and reducing it back to 42.
We also have brilliant Researchers making poetry with their calculations < A557246 > and < A597314 > "
It's just too easy
Ih-Dschieh Posted Jan 8, 2008
Of course I could include the two sixes inside the brackets and substitute them with +6-6 or *sqrt(6*6)...
Maybe I should try to avoid multiplying by 7 and 6 at the end i.e. get to 42 without the first six equalling 1 or 0? Might be a challenge.
It's just too easy
Ih-Dschieh Posted Jan 9, 2008
Got one without using 7*6 at the end:
(1+0)*(7-2)+6*6+7-6=42
By the way - I think using inv tan is cheating because the division of the circle into 360 degrees is arbitrary and not universal.
It's just too easy
vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) Posted Jan 9, 2008
Well yes, InvTan is kinda cheating, so is adding loads of leading zeroes, but try telling that to the italics .
Its all just creative bookkeeping - not everyone has 8 digits to play around with you know. When Argon0 first made the page, 5 or 6 digits was the norm.
It's just too easy
Ih-Dschieh Posted Jan 9, 2008
May be interesting to know from which number on it's always possible to reach 42... How about a mathematical proof?
It's just too easy
Potholer Posted Jan 13, 2008
For 1072667, the simplest answer seems to be
10-7+26+6+7
If you're using simple operations, (+-*\, combining digits, power, factorial and sqrt) I think there won't be a number above which all other numbers work, since 10^n will always fail.
maybe it'd work with some other conditions (minimum sum of digits?), but it might just not be a soluble question.
It's just too easy
Ih-Dschieh Posted Jan 13, 2008
Well, you forgot my last 6...
But factorial saves every '0'
So 10000000 will work:
10*(0!+0!+0!+0!)+0!+0!=42
And has anybody ever used log?
It's just too easy
Potholer Posted Jan 16, 2008
0! does feel like a bit of a cheat.
Even if it is defined to be 1 (for the purposes of certain calculations?) it's not really in the spirit of "Product of all the numbers between 1 and n, inclusive".
It's just too easy
Malabarista - now with added pony Posted Jan 20, 2008
Well, 6*9 = 42 in base 13
If 6*7 = 42 in base 10, then in base 13 it would be:
1:1
2:2
3:3
...
9:9
10:a
11:b
12:c
13:10
14:11
...
22:19
23:1a
24:2b
25:2c
26:20
...
35:29
36:2a
37:2b
38:2c
39:30
40:31
41:32
42:33
so 6*7=33
Or not.
It's just too easy
Ih-Dschieh Posted Jan 20, 2008
Oh, I understand base eight well enough - just forget about your thumbs. But base thirteen - I just wouldn't know which toes I'd have to use!
Key: Complain about this post
It's just too easy
- 1: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 8, 2008)
- 2: Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired (Jan 8, 2008)
- 3: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 8, 2008)
- 4: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 8, 2008)
- 5: vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) (Jan 9, 2008)
- 6: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 9, 2008)
- 7: vogonpoet (AViators at A13264670) (Jan 9, 2008)
- 8: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 9, 2008)
- 9: Potholer (Jan 13, 2008)
- 10: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 13, 2008)
- 11: Potholer (Jan 16, 2008)
- 12: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 16, 2008)
- 13: Malabarista - now with added pony (Jan 20, 2008)
- 14: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 20, 2008)
- 15: Malabarista - now with added pony (Jan 20, 2008)
- 16: Ih-Dschieh (Jan 20, 2008)
More Conversations for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."