A Conversation for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]

Which number?

Post 1

Belle {Stunning red-head, more insane than brilliant, really... Keeper of the Top Ten lists...CDN}

Which number is it? A974009 or 219869?

Either way, do mine!


Which number?

Post 2

six7s


It's your U (userpage or researcher) number

so...

(-2 - 1 + 9) * (-8 + 6 + 9) = 42 smiley - smiley


Which number?

Post 3

Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner)

... or (just as a backup)

21*(9+8-6-9) = 42

... or (just as another line of defense)

2.1*(9+8-6+9) = 42

Jeremy


Which number?

Post 4

six7s


2.1 * 20 smiley - cool

Not sure if it's Argon0-compliant but it's definitley thinking outside the square smiley - ok


Which number?

Post 5

Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner)

I love those solutions ... not too many brackets ... and a tiny little gimmick smiley - winkeye

Jeremy


Which number?

Post 6

Belle {Stunning red-head, more insane than brilliant, really... Keeper of the Top Ten lists...CDN}

Thanks guys!

Are there really 220 000 other users on the guide?


Which number?

Post 7

Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner)

Always a pleasure ... smiley - cool


Which number?

Post 8

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

Jeremy's 2.1 is perfectly valid - it doesn't introduce another number, and I've used 4^.5 to generate 2 before...

If you go to http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/info you'll see that there are actually 156314 registered researchers...

Welcome, Belle, to the Mythical s of the DoQuaDecaGonic Table....


Key: Complain about this post