A Conversation for The Scouts' Home Page
Point of PR Etiquette
Pinniped Started conversation Mar 20, 2005
Does anyone know if there's an acknowledged precedent for naming PR thread commenters as joint authors in an Entry?
I've never done so except in cases where text has been contributed (churl that I am), but it occurs to me that observations that significantly shape and improve the final piece should maybe be acknowledged in this way, even if all the writing is due to the original author.
Or maybe it's good form to go further, and include everyone whose suggestions were incorporated.
Any suggestions would be welcomed. I think I probably have a reputation to live up from.
Pin
Point of PR Etiquette
Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream Posted Mar 20, 2005
I don't think many PR reviewers/commenters would expect to be credited in an author’s Entry. (Though I guess it would depend how much was added due to them) I would imagine most make comments/suggestions for the good of the Guide, rather than self-acknowledgement.
I have refused a couple of times, and removed my name from one, as I didn't feel one paragraph in the whole Entry was deserving of such credit.
My as they say
Emmily
Point of PR Etiquette
There is only one thing worse than being Gosho, and that is not being Gosho Posted Mar 20, 2005
There are dozens (maybe hundreds) of precedents for it, but whether it should be made official policy (if that's what you're suggesting)? I don't thinnk so - it would be much too hard to to decide where to draw the line on how much a commenter should contribute to an entry in order to get a credit.
If an author wants to do it and the commenter has no objection, they should be allowed to decide between themselves.
Point of PR Etiquette
Pinniped Posted Mar 20, 2005
Definitely not suggesting official policy
Just trying to make sure I'm following the established courtesies.
Thanks for the tips!
Point of PR Etiquette
There is only one thing worse than being Gosho, and that is not being Gosho Posted Mar 20, 2005
Point of PR Etiquette
Number Six Posted Mar 21, 2005
I reckon if there's a fact that gets mentioned by someone in PR, and it makes it into an entry and it otherwise wouldn't have been mentioned, then it's a nice gesture to credit the researcher that helped. So I usually do
But some people do it, some don't - and although most researchers like it, one or two have said they didn't do enough to warrant a credit and ask not to be credited. So you pays your money and takes your choice
Key: Complain about this post
Point of PR Etiquette
- 1: Pinniped (Mar 20, 2005)
- 2: Emmily ~ Roses are red, Peas are green, My face is a laugh, But yours is a scream (Mar 20, 2005)
- 3: There is only one thing worse than being Gosho, and that is not being Gosho (Mar 20, 2005)
- 4: Pinniped (Mar 20, 2005)
- 5: There is only one thing worse than being Gosho, and that is not being Gosho (Mar 20, 2005)
- 6: Number Six (Mar 21, 2005)
- 7: Pinniped (Mar 21, 2005)
More Conversations for The Scouts' Home Page
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."