A Conversation for Talking Point: Are We Really Alone In The Universe?
More sausage, anyone?
General Scary Posted Jun 11, 2007
Great WHO TOLD THE SCIENCE CLUB ABOUT THIS!!! lol
More sausage, anyone?
kuzushi Posted Jun 11, 2007
Of course we can only speculate about what ET intelligence would be like, but I suppose it's inevitable bureaucracy and HSE equivalents come with sophisticated societies.
More sausage, anyone?
Researcher U197087 Posted Jun 11, 2007
Since time is restricted to the understood dimensions of aforementioned provender, words like prior, before and such probably infer a cause-effect relationship that may not have any relevance outside our understood concept of physical laws which are limited to the universe we are in. Or something like that. We need to think of it as a process because we are mortal and time is running out for all of us.
Outside of time, a stone falling off a chair is not something that happens, it just *is*.
More sausage, anyone?
Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master Posted Jun 11, 2007
Yeah the evil old HSE trying to stop companies from making money in a way that kills and hurts people.
Never mind the fact that fatalities and serious injuries go down wherever you have empowered safety reps ensuring adherance to health and safety. Those dead workers are such whingers....
More sausage, anyone?
kuzushi Posted Jun 11, 2007
I found this in Richard Dawkins's book:
"The spontaneous arising by chance of the first hereditary molecule strikes many as improbable." p.164
Dawkins confirms that life did arise spontaneously by chance.
No thanks Ive got all the sausage i need and then some!
badger party tony party green party Posted Jun 11, 2007
Dawkins asserts it he doesnt confirm it.
There is evidence that suggests he's right and he is probably basing his assertion on what the evidence others have put forward suggests but as far as I know there is no one of serious scientific reute claiming to know to the level of "confirming"chance as the exclusive source for the origin of life.
However all the theological evidence despite being contradictory is more importantly completely unsupportable by an empirical standard.
Therefore given that no one can disprove the or even begin to undermine the assertion that life is a chance happening while all the various fairy stories fall apart under any close scrutiny chance looks like being the most probable answer improbable as it may seem.
As CConana Dyle said, once youve eliminated the impossible whatever is left no matter how improbable must be the truth.
one love
No thanks Ive got all the sausage i need and then some!
kuzushi Posted Jun 12, 2007
As if that's not enough, some scientists say the Big Bang theory, based on red shift, is wrong (something to do with wrong data).
Key: Complain about this post
More sausage, anyone?
- 381: swl (Jun 11, 2007)
- 382: General Scary (Jun 11, 2007)
- 383: kuzushi (Jun 11, 2007)
- 384: General Scary (Jun 11, 2007)
- 385: kuzushi (Jun 11, 2007)
- 386: General Scary (Jun 11, 2007)
- 387: Researcher U197087 (Jun 11, 2007)
- 388: kuzushi (Jun 11, 2007)
- 389: Researcher U197087 (Jun 11, 2007)
- 390: Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master (Jun 11, 2007)
- 391: swl (Jun 11, 2007)
- 392: kuzushi (Jun 11, 2007)
- 393: badger party tony party green party (Jun 11, 2007)
- 394: fluffykerfuffle (Jun 12, 2007)
- 395: kuzushi (Jun 12, 2007)
- 396: fluffykerfuffle (Jun 12, 2007)
- 397: fluffykerfuffle (Jun 12, 2007)
- 398: kuzushi (Jun 12, 2007)
- 399: General Scary (Jun 12, 2007)
- 400: kuzushi (Jun 12, 2007)
More Conversations for Talking Point: Are We Really Alone In The Universe?
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."