A Conversation for Talking Point: Are We Really Alone In The Universe?

More sausage, anyone?

Post 381

swl

smiley - biggrinsmiley - winkeye


More sausage, anyone?

Post 382

General Scary

Great WHO TOLD THE SCIENCE CLUB ABOUT THIS!!! lol


More sausage, anyone?

Post 383

kuzushi


Of course we can only speculate about what ET intelligence would be like, but I suppose it's inevitable bureaucracy and HSE equivalents come with sophisticated societies.


More sausage, anyone?

Post 384

General Scary

AHS Aliens Health Society!


More sausage, anyone?

Post 385

kuzushi


How would you pronounce that?


More sausage, anyone?

Post 386

General Scary

the ahs's


More sausage, anyone?

Post 387

Researcher U197087

Since time is restricted to the understood dimensions of aforementioned provender, words like prior, before and such probably infer a cause-effect relationship that may not have any relevance outside our understood concept of physical laws which are limited to the universe we are in. Or something like that. We need to think of it as a process because we are mortal and time is running out for all of us.

Outside of time, a stone falling off a chair is not something that happens, it just *is*.


More sausage, anyone?

Post 388

kuzushi

infer or imply?


More sausage, anyone?

Post 389

Researcher U197087

Presuppose.


More sausage, anyone?

Post 390

Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master

Yeah the evil old HSE trying to stop companies from making money in a way that kills and hurts people.

Never mind the fact that fatalities and serious injuries go down wherever you have empowered safety reps ensuring adherance to health and safety. Those dead workers are such whingers....


More sausage, anyone?

Post 391

swl

smiley - laughChill FB. I wasn't being serious smiley - ok


More sausage, anyone?

Post 392

kuzushi


I found this in Richard Dawkins's book:

"The spontaneous arising by chance of the first hereditary molecule strikes many as improbable." p.164

Dawkins confirms that life did arise spontaneously by chance.


No thanks Ive got all the sausage i need and then some!

Post 393

badger party tony party green party

Dawkins asserts it he doesnt confirm it.

There is evidence that suggests he's right and he is probably basing his assertion on what the evidence others have put forward suggests but as far as I know there is no one of serious scientific reute claiming to know to the level of "confirming"chance as the exclusive source for the origin of life.

However all the theological evidence despite being contradictory is more importantly completely unsupportable by an empirical standard.

Therefore given that no one can disprove the or even begin to undermine the assertion that life is a chance happening while all the various fairy stories fall apart under any close scrutiny chance looks like being the most probable answer improbable as it may seem.

As CConana Dyle said, once youve eliminated the impossible whatever is left no matter how improbable must be the truth.

one love smiley - rainbow


No thanks Ive got all the sausage i need and then some!

Post 394

fluffykerfuffle

smiley - space
smiley - biggrin ....the big SPLAT!!?? (post 369)


No thanks Ive got all the sausage i need and then some!

Post 395

kuzushi

As if that's not enough, some scientists say the Big Bang theory, based on red shift, is wrong (something to do with wrong data).


...more sausage?

Post 396

fluffykerfuffle

smiley - space
smiley - scientistsmiley - magic
no... for reals ..haha.. do you have a link for that BIG SPLAT thing? smiley - biggrin


...more sausage?

Post 397

fluffykerfuffle

smiley - space
oh i found it.... hmm the date on it is april 10, 2002.... frightfully close to april fools day.... smiley - wow


...more sausage?

Post 398

kuzushi


I'll have to get back to you 'cos we can only get BBC websites here smiley - sadface


ENOUGH WITH SAUSAGES!

Post 399

General Scary

U CAN ONLY GET BBC TOO?


ENOUGH SAUSAGES?

Post 400

kuzushi


Yep.


Key: Complain about this post