A Conversation for Correct Use of the Apostrophe In English
Only missing letters
Researcher 213915 Started conversation Jan 5, 2003
In an in-house magazine, a manager took it upon herself to write an article lecturing the staff on the use of the apostrophe. She was tired, she said of reading reports showing ignorant use of the apostrophe. But she herself fell into the trap caused by the “invention” of the apostrophe of possession. There’s really no such thing. I agree with Wand’rin Star, there is only one sort of apostrophe – to show missing letters. This aforementioned didactic manager wanted to tell people to use “it’s” to mean “belonging to it”! Was her face red when her error was pointed out to her – well that bit you could see that was not covered in egg, anyway. If teachers would only tell pupils a bit about the history of English pronunciation and the way English used to be an inflected language — as Wand’rin Star says, “mannes” became “man’s” and, plural, “boysen” (or something) became “boys’” — they wouldn’t need the complicated rules of so-called possession that was described in the original h2g2 article. Anyway, the best rule to my mind is, “When in doubt, leave it out!”
Key: Complain about this post
Only missing letters
More Conversations for Correct Use of the Apostrophe In English
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."