A Conversation for The 3n+1 Conjecture - Proof Needed!

Proof

Post 1

iaoth

I have found a marvellous proof, but this thread is not able to contain it. smiley - winkeye


Proof

Post 2

Gnomon - time to move on

The thread is too narrow, is it?


Proof

Post 3

iaoth

Yep.


Proof

Post 4

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

This lookes to me what Fermat wrote in the margin, to become his famous "last statement".
If you are right, I would like to see it.


Proof

Post 5

iaoth

Sorry, that was my famous last statement, and therefore I can't show you the proof now. In fact, ignore this posting altogether since posting no. 1 in this thread was my last statement. Wait, you can't follow any instructions in this posting, since you're ignoring it... That's a nice paradox. smiley - smiley


Proof

Post 6

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

As a matter of fact, I should have said: his last theorem, and it took a few hundred years to see a proof. That leaves you a lot of time and still do better.
Most paradoxes can be paradoctered by looking from some other side.
If your proof is accepted, we will see abstracts of it in popular papers and websites.


Proof

Post 7

iaoth

It wasn't really a theorem, it was a conjecture. A theorem is a conjecture and a proof.

And I hope you didn't take me seriously when I misquoted Fermat. smiley - smiley


Proof

Post 8

Future World Dictator (13)

I was wondering how long it would take for someone to post that. Of course you should have written it in latin. smiley - smiley


Proof

Post 9

iaoth

Sorry, I don't know the Latin version... smiley - erm


Proof

Post 10

Future World Dictator (13)

Actually (racks memory) as I remember Fermat's last theorem was not the only theorem he never told anyone his proof of. There was this habit among mathematicians of proving stuff and then writing to each other and saying "Look at this, aren't I clever? Bet you can't prove it." So once Fermat died people had to go through all his writings and dig out the proofs that they couldn't do. Some they never found (maybe they never existed) so they had to prove them anyway. The last to be proved was FLT. Hence the name.

So you don't have to say nothing ever again, iaoth, in latin or otherwise. You just have to claim to have proofs of lots of other theorems as well. And then die.

Which, I'm sure, will be a relief.


Latin

Post 11

Adhemar

Latin? I thought the 'The margin is too small to contain it' quote was written originally in French by Pierre. I could be wrong though.


Proof

Post 12

iaoth

smiley - laugh


Proof

Post 13

Shimoda

I believe you'll find that infinity causes this theorem to go into spasms and die. Though I may be incorrect.


Proof

Post 14

Tube Boy

All I'm understanding so far is : "yadda yadda yadda Fermat yadda yadda infinity yadda yadda yadda maths yadda yadda"!


Proof

Post 15

Future World Dictator (13)

You've lost me there, what does yadda mean?

Anyway, if you follow the link to FLT in the article you'll see that he said, and I quote, "hanc marginis exiguitas non caperet", which is apparently latin.


Proof

Post 16

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

Tricky, those last two. As it isn't english, some parts could have been deleted. smiley - smiley


Proof

Post 17

NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.)

"[Yadda removed by moderator]"?
smiley - smiley


Proof

Post 18

Tube Boy

"Yadda yadda yadda" meaning "blah blah blah" or "straight over my head!", etc...


Proof

Post 19

Future World Dictator (13)

Hmm. I'd just like to point out to any moderators out there that the gobbledygook in my last post says 'but this margin is too narrow' and not 'Tony Blair is a smarmy git who should not be voted for under any circumstances'. Which, in any case, is only partly true. (And it's too late now, we've done the deed)


Proof

Post 20

ZiGGY^

A) It isnt linear
B) It is a blatant misdirection of numerical shells.


Key: Complain about this post