A Conversation for The Tunguska Incident


Post 1


I remember watching an Equinox or Horizon programme about this a few years ago. The scientist investigating concluded that the blast was caused by a comet and not a meteorite as there wasn't any alien rock to be found at the site. The difference between the two, as well you know, that a comet is made from ice while a meteorite is made from rock. He also concluded that the comet crashed at an angle of about 30 degrees resulting in a V-shaped burn mark.


Post 2


The theory is that the comet exploded above the ground, ratehr than actually hitting the ground- this would explain the trees near groound zero still standing but being stripped of their branches.

TKsmiley - pirate


Post 3


Carl Sagan's Cosmos highlights this theory in Part 4 of the series, and I don't remember where in the book.

Worth watching and reading... smiley - winkeye


Post 4


I also recall the programme. It certainly makes more sense than the nuclear powered flying saucer theory; even with 1950s technology, it's fairly difficult to get 'instant sunrise' with a reactor core.

Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more