A Conversation for Relativity

Relatively Easy :-)

Post 1

shazzPRME

This makes it all clear to me now! Well done Arnia smiley - smiley
shazz smiley - winkeye


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 2

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

Thanks smiley - smiley

I hope to get a few more through smiley - bigeyes


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 3

Engels42 (Thingite Minister of Leaky Ethics and Spiffyness)

YES!! smiley - smiley
Great job on that one, you took a hugely difficult subject and made it easy for people to understand, just as Einstein himself intended with the book that he wrote about it. In order for people to understand something, it must interest them... smiley - winkeye
Bravo.


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 4

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

*blushes*

Thanks smiley - smiley

Any ideas for other topics in physics, maths or chemistry to cover?


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 5

Engels42 (Thingite Minister of Leaky Ethics and Spiffyness)

hmm..... How about Space-Time? smiley - smiley
It seems relevent.


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 6

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

Might be interesting though... do you know the current queue time for approved entries? smiley - smiley


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 7

Saint Taco-Chako (P.S. of mixed metaphors)

To answer the above question: A LOT!

The actual theory of relativity isn't E=mc(little 2), it's (approximately..., I don't have any greek letter keys on me):

R{subscript(mu)(eta)}-0.5g{subscript(mu)(eta)}R=-kT{subscript(mu)(eta)}
Or something...

the left hand side is, frankly, brilliant, but the right leaves much to be desired.


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 8

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

I know it is more complicated than what I quoted... I just used the bit everyone knows and which is used in A level physics. smiley - smiley

Joe aka Arnia
smiley - fish
Relative fishies


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 9

Engels42 (Thingite Minister of Leaky Ethics and Spiffyness)

If you want to know more, I suggest you read Relativity, by Max Born. It's really detailed and confusing, Good fun for people like me smiley - smiley


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 10

Captain John Carter

I appreciate the definition of relativistic velocity. The phrase comes from the theory and therefor become a null phrase - cyclic references are kind of like that. Anyway I kind of thought relativistic velocity was a measurement of how quickly long lost 'relatives' show up after you win the lottery.
Who know which is faster.

P.S I would appreciate some direction back to the page that shows how to make those smiley faces and such. Thanks.

Hey!!!!! YOU!!!!!!!


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 11

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

Ok, remove the spaces to make these work.

: - ) is smiley - smiley

: - ( is smiley - sadface

; - ) is smiley - winkeye

8 - ) is smiley - bigeyes

> < > is smiley - fish


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 12

Captain John Carter

Thanks and...

Have a good one. smiley - smiley


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 13

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

No problem smiley - smiley


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 14

Chris Tonks

Hello again.smiley - smiley
I was just wondering if anyone knows *WHY* nothing can go faster than light. I mean light is only an energy, not some amazingly special law of physics (well it is, but you know what I mean).
Oh, and on the topic of new topics, can I just mention here that you can't write about Infinity, because I'm the master of that topic!
- BigC


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 15

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

Light has no rest mass... its speed is defined by the permiability of the vacuum and hence by a fixed quality of spacetime.

Its because it has no rest mass that it is only limited by the Permiability of Vacuum smiley - winkeye

At least... I think so


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 16

Engels42 (Thingite Minister of Leaky Ethics and Spiffyness)

I'm pretty sure that according to Einstien's equations, that it takes an infinite amount of energy to reach the speed of light. smiley - winkeye And that can't happen.

Theoretically of course smiley - winkeye


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 17

Chris Tonks

Ah yes, but if, say, a torch was flashed once, the energy that it travels at is itself, which is finite. but the speed it travels at is 'the speed of light', so it doesn't have to be infinite.


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 18

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

It takes an infinite amount of energy for a body with rest mass to accelerate to and hold at the speed of light... you can, however, quantum tunnel past the speed of light and then it takes an infinite amount of energy to slow down to c smiley - smiley

As tardyons lose energy they slow down, as tachyons lose energy they speed up


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 19

Chris Tonks

Erm...tardy & tachy, eh? Riiiiiight...
Anyway, if you were to check out my article on Infinity, which isn't finished yet so I won't give you a link, you'll find that, with infinite dimensions, at least one (therefor infinite) has to have a different speed of light. So *all* we need to do is get into that other dimension, and work our way to the speed of light, and beyond!
Sorry, you won't understand that, because you need to read my article.smiley - winkeye


Relatively Easy :-)

Post 20

Joe aka Arnia, Muse, Keeper, MathEd, Guru and Zen Cook (business is booming)

smiley - smiley

I also know that the universe is unbounded but finite so there isn't a chance of that. smiley - winkeye


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more