A Conversation for Atheism
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 16, 2000
Ok, maybe just a big mix-up then. Sorry for getting the wrong impression from what you said, and for giving you the wrong impression about what I wanted to say.
And another mix-up: I don't say I *believe* there to be an afterlife. I merely suggest that an afterlife might be possible even without believing in any kind of god. My wishing it to be so is *ofcourse* no explaination, but I can still hope, can't I?
THAT's also what I meant by not having to worry about it. I simply meant to say that the possibility of an afterlife, in my opinion, is not related to any belief in a god. I know how most people fail to see the logic in that, and I accept that fact. Good grief, even *I* don't always understand what I'm saying.
DNA's 'extremism'
Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose Posted Apr 16, 2000
You may also not understand what I mean whenI say 'higher power'. (see my last post) I'm sorry about the mix up too.
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 16, 2000
Well, maybe that 'higher power' as you call it might be the same thing as the 'perpetual universal life-force' that I'm hoping to be part of. Why would an atheist not be able to believe in such a thing?
The difference between a god and this life-force might be that a god would have his own consciousness, his own agenda, whereas the universal life-force could still be an undiscovered natural phenomenon, much like gravity and most other forces of nature. Our lives are already subject to a lot of such forces, so why not this extra one that I just made up for the sake of it?
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 16, 2000
DNA's 'extremism'
Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose Posted Apr 16, 2000
But, I'm still hoping for something with conciesnousness (I no thatz spelt rong {I would have asked someone, but there's only my father here and he has to ask me how to spell bus}). Just so someone/thing could explain everything to me.
DNA's 'extremism'
jbliqemp... Posted Apr 16, 2000
I admit we are very clever animals. This in no way justifies the existence of an afterlife, typically thought up in conjunction with religion as a reward for the pious. *If* you believe in God, and work hard, and obey *these* commandments, you will have *heaven* as your reward.
Nirvana is much the same. Reincarnation is much the same.
Anything justifying a reason to submit to society's will now (against your own will) and delivering utopia upon an individual's greatest fear is an invention to avoid that fear.
I will recieve no reward or punishment for my deeds or convictions; I choose to act in a way society will accept since I do not wish to die now. I fear death. I will not rely on the construct of an afterlife to allay my fear.
-jb
DNA's 'extremism'
Alon (aka Mr.Cynic) Posted Apr 16, 2000
Yes - an atheist dismisses a sentient higher power (also known as a God). Atheist may believe in the non-material and in the afterlife. That has nothing to do with a higher power. If I believed in such powers, they would be nothing more than the gravity or electricity - just another force. They would not be self-aware and they would not make conscious decisions. Therefore it is possible to believe in an afterlife, believe that there are forces at work except those recognised by science yet still be an atheist. The difference is that atheists dismiss the idea of this deity that makes its own decisions.
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 16, 2000
Hehehe, if that's all you need, a consciousness that answers all your questions and explains everything, why not come to me? Or to any other member of this fine H2G2-society, for that matter? I'm sure some of us will gladly explain it all to you
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 16, 2000
RIGHT ON!
That's the spirit, isn't it? Not dismissing your fears *because* of some vague promise of an afterlife. Disconnect the fear of death from the *possible* reward of an afterlife, and suddenly you don't need a god anymore. Or am I now trying to make sense of something ridiculous?
DNA's 'extremism'
jbliqemp... Posted Apr 17, 2000
I thought my last post would be lost (& never read again).
Thanks for finding it Mummy.
As for whether you're trying to make sense of something ridiculous, that depends on the firmness of your convictions.
-jb
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 17, 2000
DNA's 'extremism'
jbliqemp... Posted Apr 17, 2000
lol.
Maybe. I just think that creating something to set aside a fear of the inevitable is just a little juvenile.
-jb
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 17, 2000
Juvenile? Maybe it's rather useless, but I wouldn't say juvenile.
On the other hand, as long as one doesn't have the illusion that they have avoided the inevitable, and still feels better just by creating this belief in some kind of afterlife -which doesn't hurt anyone-, why would we judge them?
DNA's 'extremism'
Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose Posted Apr 17, 2000
We really shouldn't.
But it's hard not to judge others. Especially when they have something that we wish we could have but never will, like blind faith.
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 17, 2000
Still there are hordes of people that DO have blind faith and still are unhappy. They still judge others, for example because those others do not share the same faith. To me that implies that their faith is false.
And there are also people without faith that don't judge others for having or needing it.
I forgot my point here...
DNA's 'extremism'
Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose Posted Apr 17, 2000
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 17, 2000
DNA's 'extremism'
Blatherskite the Mugwump - Bandwidth Bandit Posted Apr 18, 2000
I don't think anyone in here is judging believers for their blind faith. The problem is that that blind faith causes them to act in incredibly irrational ways, and it is their acts that we judge. Faith is all well and good, but don't force my kids to learn Creationism as if it were a science.
DNA's 'extremism'
jbliqemp... Posted Apr 18, 2000
Much agreed. When I said juvenile, I ment 'voluntary ignorance'. Most (not all) people who believe in an afterlife do so because they are afraid of not existing. They have recognized that possibility, and refuse to acknowledge it, for they feel if they acknowledge it, it will happen.
People like this tend to think that they might have a say in what happens to them when they die.
-jb
DNA's 'extremism'
The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) Posted Apr 18, 2000
A truth if ever I've seen one: "most people who believe in an afterlife, do so because they are afraid of not existing".
Very well put, jb!
I'll make a confession: I do NOT *believe* in an afterlife, but I *do* *hope* that something like that exists. Why? Simple...
Death may mean that I cease to exist, and that doesn't terrify me. It scares the shit out of me in all possible colors! I accept that it will happen, but I *hope* that it will not be the end of my consciousness.
Again: I am a true atheist, in that I do not *believe* in anything, not even in afterlife. I merely HOPE! This is a bit different, isn't it?
Key: Complain about this post
DNA's 'extremism'
- 41: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 16, 2000)
- 42: Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose (Apr 16, 2000)
- 43: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 16, 2000)
- 44: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 16, 2000)
- 45: Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose (Apr 16, 2000)
- 46: jbliqemp... (Apr 16, 2000)
- 47: Alon (aka Mr.Cynic) (Apr 16, 2000)
- 48: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 16, 2000)
- 49: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 16, 2000)
- 50: jbliqemp... (Apr 17, 2000)
- 51: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 17, 2000)
- 52: jbliqemp... (Apr 17, 2000)
- 53: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 17, 2000)
- 54: Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose (Apr 17, 2000)
- 55: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 17, 2000)
- 56: Robotron, formerly known as Robyn Graves and before that, GreyRose (Apr 17, 2000)
- 57: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 17, 2000)
- 58: Blatherskite the Mugwump - Bandwidth Bandit (Apr 18, 2000)
- 59: jbliqemp... (Apr 18, 2000)
- 60: The Mummy, administrator of the SETI@home Project (A193231) and The Reluctant Dead on the FFFF (A254314) (Apr 18, 2000)
More Conversations for Atheism
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."