## A Conversation for Group Theory

### Not Magic square but Latin

Pimms Started conversation Sep 22, 2006

Cayley tables are Latin squares, not magic squares.

Magic squares have no elements repeated at all eg 1-9

8 1 6

3 5 7

4 9 2

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MagicSquare.html

Latin Squares have no elements repeated within any column or row - like sudoku http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LatinSquare.html

After that point in the entry though the wheel came off, due to my failure to pick up what was meant by 'order' from its mention in Lagrange's Theorem onwards. Up until then 'order' is used in a different sense - which operarion comes first which comes next and so on.

Pimms

### Not Magic square but Latin

Silverfish Posted Sep 29, 2006

Thanks for the correction. One of the curators should be fixing this. I don't know why I thought it was a magic square.

By the way, order (in the sense I use it in the langrange theorem bit, and later), is the number of element in a set. So the group K I mention in the entry is a group of order 3, as it has 3 elements (0, 1 and 2). I hope that helps.

### Not Magic square but Latin

TRiG (Ireland) A dog, so bade in office Posted Sep 30, 2006

Changes made: F3198237?thread=3526001

Key: Complain about this post

### Not Magic square but Latin

### More Conversations for Group Theory

### Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."