This is the Message Centre for Mrs Zen
More checking...
Jab [Since 29th November 2002] Started conversation Aug 1, 2004
<./>T434236&latest=1</.> - "temptation" thread.
The question I have from <./>T434236&skip=371</.> the post it list (plus post 369 I think) and the message center thread at my personal space ("Just checking...") is this: Is it alway's that difficult for somebody to already agree with you? A simple yes or no will suffice.
More checking...
Jab [Since 29th November 2002] Posted Aug 1, 2004
Sweet bouncing buttons! <./>T433236&latest=1</.> may be of more use. It's alright for some with their fancy copy and paste and their multiple windows to chech back through previous post 'on the fly'...
More checking...
Mrs Zen Posted Aug 1, 2004
Not at all!
I was simply extremely confused by the way you used the word 'that'. Also the tone of the thread had got a bit antagonistic at that point, and I was presupposing antagonism that wasn't there. I was surprised, because our exchanges had been in broad agreement up to that point.
I don't do confusion that well, though I do do agreement agreeably!
I guess the answer is 'no'.
B
More checking...
Jab [Since 29th November 2002] Posted Aug 1, 2004
Right, an affirmation with "No." Sound's familiar.
There is one thing you may be able to clear up, post 272 compared with 289. Are you disagreeing with yourself re: food analogy?
More checking...
Mrs Zen Posted Aug 1, 2004
>> And there is - I hope - a difference between saying "I love chicken" and "I love chickens"
That was just a rather crude example of language use demonstrating the different ways that 'love' is used. "I like to eat chickens" vs "I f**k chickens".
The food analogies then got out of hand. I still think that the example of a use of language was a good one, and that the use of food as an analogy for human relationships is a bad one.
Cheers.
B
More checking...
Jab [Since 29th November 2002] Posted Aug 1, 2004
Ahh, "I love chicken" / "chickens" For some reason, maybe multiple partners being in the *air* I thought you meant one chicken to love as opposed to a want to love many chikens.
The thought "did it mean" the f**king of chickens the language twist never occured until the next day. Yes it had me confussed, which way it was meant with all the food analogy that followed.
More checking...
Mrs Zen Posted Aug 1, 2004
I just have a very nasty mind and a devious way with words.
The food analogies were ok, but ultimately they distracted us all.
It is a wierd night here, tonight, and I am going to go to bed.
Ben
More checking...
Jab [Since 29th November 2002] Posted Aug 6, 2004
Hi Ben, when you took a couple of days out from posting. The h2g2 Editors left a post for you <./>T454805&skip=10</.> it's informative about the use of the yikes button.
Key: Complain about this post
More checking...
- 1: Jab [Since 29th November 2002] (Aug 1, 2004)
- 2: Jab [Since 29th November 2002] (Aug 1, 2004)
- 3: Mrs Zen (Aug 1, 2004)
- 4: Jab [Since 29th November 2002] (Aug 1, 2004)
- 5: Mrs Zen (Aug 1, 2004)
- 6: Jab [Since 29th November 2002] (Aug 1, 2004)
- 7: Mrs Zen (Aug 1, 2004)
- 8: Jab [Since 29th November 2002] (Aug 6, 2004)
More Conversations for Mrs Zen
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."