h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Here's where we are upto since you stopped posting your dispariging comments and left the convo. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F19585?thread=401889&skip=0&show=20 http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2002/10/21/BA22929.DTL one love

Nice try

1) I didn't post any dispariging comments

2) I have a life and the posts were getting too long and too many over the weekend.

3) Why are you posting to me?

Eh The use of this smiley (laugh) followed by your sarcastic comments about also suing Rome etc...and your condemnation of it as a lawsuit simply aimed at foreigners by black Americans would in most peoples books be considered disparaging.(sorry for the spelling error) Disparaging: To decry; depreciate; undervalue; underrate; cheapen; vilify; reproach; detract from; derogate from; degrade; debase. See Decry. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F19585?thread=401889&post=5104426#p5101965 I posted to you and others who made stupid comments on the first couple of pages, foe me and others involved that you might be able to lift your level of understanding beyond the base level you exhibit and for you that you might not make yourself look so stupid and offensive in the future. Note I chose to do it here in relative privacy and did not do single you out on the onriginal thread. I did not do this expecting praise or thanks. One love

Now that was a terrible effort. It's not working and you can insult me as much as you like but I won't be goaded.

For these recent weeks it's been bliss without you. Don't spoil it now

Oh thats your game.

see ya then

OK since you're back I will explain in nice esy to understand terms that even you might be able to grasp.

See you clearly had very little knowledge of the issue or you would not have made such infantile and negative remarks. You would not have inserted the laugh smiley unless you had any idea of what the law suit was really about. Only a truly odious person would treat such a serious subject with such unfeeling levity.

I attempted to reacquaint you with the thread in the hope that you might learn the full gravity and facts of the subjects, and why your opinion and treatment of it was so off beam.

I was trying to help you, true I am not the most easy going of teachers but what do you want for free?

I really thought it would do you and the world good to get the real deal on this. However I get the impression that you either straight up prefer ignorance or you are too lazy to bother reading long posts. How pathetic is that?

There is one other possiblity, that you could not understand what was in theposts. Not alwauys easy with complicated subjects and made harder when some people me being one of the major culprits dont post very clearly. So if you want I will help you with any bits you cant get your head around at first. I will consider it a privillige

one love

Sad sad little man...

Tell me (no don't really), if I have no interest in a short post from you then why would I bother reading a long one?


Are you lonely?

No, far from it, but thanks for asking

Are you is that why you show up on convos and leave blank messages?

I do know that a lot of callers to the samaritans are so ovewhelmed by what's inside that they cant find the words.

one love

<>
Have you done that Blicky? I am sorry for you, oh so sorry.
Don't hassle people, you'll be a lot better loved if you adhere to that rule...

I think we have another sad insight into BBs' mind.

Having to last post in a thread on my makes things tidy. A lonely person might see that as an invitation.

Hi folks,

You are absolutely right Apparition that is another sad insight.Sad because it is just as inaccurate as your other ones have been.

Also sad because if you were trying to say I am sad, you should have structured the sentence thus:

I think we have another insight into BB's sad mind.

Whereas you wrote:

"I think we have another sad insight into BBs' mind."

Grammatically the way the sentence is stuctured is ambiguous so the reader is unsure what is being refered to as "sad". (Am I being pedantic or sad now Why not ask your mommy for help with that too, she's always saying what a fabulous teacher she is, well she suggests it anyway.

Moving on I noticed you leaving blank messages elsewhere which is why I asked about that. Does your fetish for leaving tidy blank messages extend to *other* researchers' PSs too?

Oh well it takes all sorts.

one love

Della, If I told you that people had walked on the moon would you think I had too Im glad that you have pity for those who are in so much emotional turmoil that even when "faced" with a stranger who is trained in counselling (one of the important skills being listening withoput jumping to ludicrous conclusions, which is why I think you'd have never made a good counsellor) cant bring themsleves to speak about what is troubling them even though calling the Samaritans indicates a need to unburden themselves. Your son left blank messages on acouple of threads I was on and I just enquired, but once again thanks for your concern. Your son says he has nothing to talk about, Im cool with that, not so cool with some of the things he does post though. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F117154?thread=378879 http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F131107?thread=377183 http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F55377?thread=381363 As well as not agreeing and in many cases strongly disagreeing with some of the more unpleasant things he posts, hence this thread, it also has to be said that he has the unfortunate habit of quite happily doing things to others over and over. Yet he whines like a stuck pig when peole do the exact same things to him. one love

"Why not ask your mommy for help with that too"

I can't be bothered with reading tho whole thing but judging by this I've upset him and he sucking his thumb and stomping his feet.

Judging by the links, BB either has a tonne of spare time or an obsession. I wonder if he's going to start stalking me again?

Spare time, or obsession? Mmmm. I wonder. Sad, either way.