This is the Message Centre for Researcher 178815
Errrrrr.... whatever
Saturnine Posted Feb 16, 2004
Exactly. No one really knows who we are talking to, so it's impossible to pick on someone based on their gender/race etc. 
Ferret, for the record, I just think she was floudering for a response. So she picks on you. It's a defence mechanism.
Errrrrr.... whatever
Researcher 178815 Posted Feb 16, 2004
Do I bother posting anything? This is all too farcical now.
Errrrrr.... whatever
Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master Posted Feb 16, 2004
Well... I just think she should think about what she posts and why.
Errrrrr.... whatever
Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master Posted Feb 16, 2004
Well... I just think she should think about what she posts and why.
Makes me laugh what she is accusing me of. Read my p/s or most of my postings in politics/issue threads. Heck I am a proper bleeding heart liberal/leftie...
Oh well
Errrrrr.... whatever
Researcher 178815 Posted Feb 16, 2004
I know what you mean - all this everyone else is now an abuser of /their/ ISP, and will be reported -- and is being logged on-site. 
And as for harassment being forwarded to her lawyer/solicitor. Ach.
while (loggedin == true){ 
post($nonsense); credibility = credibility - 1; } 
No, actually, this does matter.
clzoomer- a bit woobly Posted Feb 16, 2004
Never fear, people. These kind of posts indicates the kind of person that suffers from FAS (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome) as I have mentioned before. They may in fact not be suffering from it but the symptoms are similar. Incredibly short attention span, short temper, inability to follow a logical train of thought, and pack mentality. The attention span problem is in our favour because when they spot some shiny object they will, like a magpie lose all interest in their *holey war* (misspelling intentional).
I would consider it a badge of honour if this post was yikesed. Especially since they don't seem to realise that it is temporary (that attention thing again). 
No, actually, this does matter.
Potholer Posted Feb 17, 2004
Following quick research through various backlogs, I'm rather at a loss to see what slanderous or defamatory postings there have been against CW, though I must admit that, looking at her postings, it can be hard to understand exactly who she is talking at at times, or indeed anything else.
If she indicated who had said what and where it might be easier to follow her argument, though first impressions would tend to indicate that with the logic and debating skills she has choosen to demonstrate thus far, obscurity is possibly a welcome friend.
As for harassment, it would appear to be mainly one-way at the moment.
I do feel for the moderators, though I suppose it's not too hard for them to decide what needs to get pulled.
No, actually, this does matter.
cuddlywolf@x Posted Feb 17, 2004
the plug on this site thats needing pulled
Errrrrr.... whatever
cuddlywolf@x Posted Feb 17, 2004
thought id get a page of results from u all lmfao !
makes good reading for my kids by the way 
Errrrrr.... whatever
Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master Posted Feb 17, 2004
What a shame... we won't get insulted anymore then have it claimed that we are "Harrasing" you.
Errrrrr.... whatever
Researcher 178815 Posted Feb 17, 2004
One thing that strikes me about CW is that there seems to be a lot of Sock Puppeteering going on by them.
Errrrrr.... whatever
clzoomer- a bit woobly Posted Feb 17, 2004
Hmmm, interesting. CW unsubscribes and a few posts later a post is moderated.
That would indicate to me either:
a) She was not telling the truth
b) One of her sock puppets or her boyfriend allowed her to not tell the truth by representing her.
c) Their attention span is even shorter than I thought!
Errrrrr.... whatever
cuddlywolf@x Posted Feb 18, 2004
Noooooooo actually more pressing issues that are more important to me offline, actually im to busy to argue on this seems waste of time anyway so please all get ur facts straight
Errrrrr.... whatever
cuddlywolf@x Posted Feb 18, 2004
Think its more important my newborn daughter has serious medical problems
Key: Complain about this post
Errrrrr.... whatever
- 41: Saturnine (Feb 16, 2004)
- 42: Researcher 178815 (Feb 16, 2004)
- 43: Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master (Feb 16, 2004)
- 44: Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master (Feb 16, 2004)
- 45: Researcher 178815 (Feb 16, 2004)
- 46: clzoomer- a bit woobly (Feb 16, 2004)
- 47: Researcher 178815 (Feb 16, 2004)
- 48: Saturnine (Feb 17, 2004)
- 49: Potholer (Feb 17, 2004)
- 50: cuddlywolf@x (Feb 17, 2004)
- 51: cuddlywolf@x (Feb 17, 2004)
- 52: cuddlywolf@x (Feb 17, 2004)
- 53: cuddlywolf@x (Feb 17, 2004)
- 54: Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master (Feb 17, 2004)
- 55: Researcher 178815 (Feb 17, 2004)
- 56: Saturnine (Feb 17, 2004)
- 57: clzoomer- a bit woobly (Feb 17, 2004)
- 58: cuddlywolf@x (Feb 18, 2004)
- 59: Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master (Feb 18, 2004)
- 60: cuddlywolf@x (Feb 18, 2004)
More Conversations for Researcher 178815
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."