Journal Entries
university project back on
Posted Jul 24, 2002
after receiving suggestions that university entries could be helped by going through the writing workshop, I have put the first five in to see what feedback arrives.
hopefully there will be enough that it is worth putting the other entries into this forum as well.
Discuss this Journal entry [1]
Latest reply: Jul 24, 2002
no time!
Posted Apr 25, 2002
due to time constraints I am currently suspending attempts to work on A657137 but hopefully I will be able to get back to it soon.
due to apathy (by others) I am being forced into suspending work on the intelligence project (see A584525 ) as it is almost impossible to do a good job of not being too controversial on this subject without feedback.
As soon as some more feedback comes in, I will try and get it started again.
Discuss this Journal entry [3]
Latest reply: Apr 25, 2002
solutions
Posted Jul 17, 2001
While not happy with the events surrounding the lifetime ban of lekz, at least there is now a discussion going on about how to stop these events happening again. therefore, as mentioned in my previous journal entry, the intelligence project is back up and running over at http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/A584525 so please drop by and give feedback, every little helps 
, especially on this subject.
Discuss this Journal entry [1]
Latest reply: Jul 17, 2001
unreasonable behaviour by h2g2
Posted Jul 14, 2001
So, they decide to ban LeKZ for life, not for what she said, but for what someone else has said could be made from what she said, combined with a previous tempory ban for seemingly arbitrary reasons.
So far, I know of a few researchers that have already left in disgust that the people who wanted to get rid of LeKZ have managed to get her removed in this manner.
Until such time as a full and reasonable explanation appears of "WHAT SHE ACTUALLY WROTE" that got her banned the first time, and also of what she wrote that got her permanently banned, You will find that all of my current projects have now been hidden in disgust, and will remain that way.
I will still be available for discussion, for the moment at least. This entire episode, and how it appears to have been handled in a biased and highly partizan manner seem to me to be a repudiation of everything that douglas adams and the bbc stand for.
I hope they will now be open, present ALL of the TRUE facts to the community, and accept the community verdict on if they were right or not.
Discuss this Journal entry [1]
Latest reply: Jul 14, 2001
no feedback on intelligence
Posted Jul 9, 2001
well, I have been visiting the people who have been inthe infamous intelligence thread, telling them that the university project is at first draft, and in need of feedback, and what have I got, not a jot!
come on people, show us what you are made of.
Discuss this Journal entry [1]
Latest reply: Jul 9, 2001
xyroth
Researcher U149792
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."