This is the Message Centre for Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

On a curious property of 3435

Post 1

toybox

Hello, I stumbled upon a paper which might interest you:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.3038

smiley - cheers


On a curious property of 3435

Post 2

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Thanks. Unfortunately, until I get software to read the article I won't know what it's about. It's not a high priority, but I'll get around to it eventually.

smiley - cheers


On a curious property of 3435

Post 3

toybox

I can disclose the 'curious property' if you wish. But I wouldn't want to ruin the suspense smiley - biggrin


On a curious property of 3435

Post 4

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Tell me. I might just forget about it, so you needn't worry about there being some suspense you will be eliminating.smiley - erm


On a curious property of 3435

Post 5

toybox

It's unforgettable.

3435 = 3^3 + 4^4 + 3^3 + 5^5

smiley - biggrin


On a curious property of 3435

Post 6

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Thanks. Now I can forget about it. smiley - cheers


On a curious property of 3435

Post 7

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Well, I may as well research the problem a little bit.smiley - erm


On a curious property of 3435

Post 8

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Ah, nice! The only other 4-digit number of this type with digit values up to 35 is 6534 in base 20.smiley - biggrin


On a curious property of 3435

Post 9

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

It took a long time to get the five-digit solutions, and I'm going to lower the size of the maximum digit to 15 to continue, but here are the three- and five-digit solutions: 131 and 313 in base 4, 513 in base 25, 615 in base 91, 126 in base 215, 171 in base 904, 22352 and 23452 in base 6, 13454 in base 7, and 33661 in base 13.


On a curious property of 3435

Post 10

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

I decided my method has been weak and to start over, but I've gotten 156262 and 1656547 in base 9 as possibly the only six- and seven-digit examples, and 18453278 and 18453487 in base 11 as possibly the only eight-digit ones. I've been approximating the base for a given possible representation with an unsound method, though.


On a curious property of 3435

Post 11

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

My approximation was fine--same exact results, but my method is still weak. I'll have to go at this again by a different route if I want to have any hope of checking large digits and bases and long lengths.


On a curious property of 3435

Post 12

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

This looks like well-trod terrain, and I'm leaving it. I pointed it out to someone over at wikipedia, and he linked me to an article which further links to other things. I'm a bit surprised anyone would be writing about it as though it were new. It is not.


On a curious property of 3435

Post 13

Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Now, I have something interesting to report. If you start with constant 1 and build a polynomial sequence by the rule that the coefficient should be the least positive one that gives a result relstively prime to all of its predecessors, you get no pattern until the 89th degree, and then at least to the 1000th you get all 1s except for 2s at powers congruent to 3 modulo 5.


Key: Complain about this post

More Conversations for Eveneye--Eegogee--Julzes

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more