h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Entry: Hints and Tips for Survival Horror Fun - A8658525
Author: Serephina - U191719

Ive had a fiddle with this..any thoughts?
(If the server will post it!)

The server seems to have started this thread twice..sorry!

You seem to have been fiddling all over the place

Does it look ok though?

Serephina, this is the duplicated thread isn't it?

seems to be

You don't have the option to remvoe it from the main Peer Review page, do you?

No, it doesn't come up there at all that I can see.

Not for me either, it's one of those threads.

So this is not the thread where I'm supposed to put my nit-picks? I have a few. Some style/grammar (is it still acceptable to put those in the PR thread or have manners progressed in the past few years?). But mostly I'm thinking there's room for expansion.

For eg: weapons. All you have to say is that you get some and have to acquire more? I'm under the impression that really good players can swap out weapons in an instant depending on who they're fighting. Shouldn't you mention that some weapons work better on some enemies than others?

An example or two might help also. I liked the egg in the footnote (although not the sentence structure). The footnote also suggests that users try items in different ways to see what they do. You might give that a line.

*Pauses and wonders if she's dictating to a ghost thread*

I think I'll stop now.

Leo, this entry is not in Peer Review. Somehow this conversation still exists, even though the entry doesn't show up in Peer Review. So you needn't post any comments, as it's not for review.

Now I'm totally funcused. I found this in Peer Review. I went trawling through the PR forum and that one caught my eye.

Only tangentially related, but how recent is this new interface?

So you found this in Peer Review using the new H2G2? That's interesting. There's a bug in the old h2g2 whereby this entry, and a few like it, don't appear in Peer Review, but their conversations still looks as if they are in Peer Review. Obviously it's different with the new system

The new system has been around for about 3 months now but is still full of bugs, so we don't use it.

Ooh, this is a very spooky bug. Can you direct me to the proper version? Is there one? This one is showing in the Barlesque version. . . should I ask the Eds about it?

I found this in Peer Review as well.

I think this ghost thread is one of the 1111 Entries in review that the new Barlesque version is showing, the actual Entry was Edited years ago. This is an echo.