A Conversation for Talking Point: Snail Mail versus Email
I think I would go for E-mail...
Yoav Feuerstein - The Phantom Started conversation Jul 24, 2002
Although the virus-risk in e-mails, it's faster and more simple.. don't you think?
I think I would go for E-mail...
Researcher 199160 Posted Jul 24, 2002
I agree emails are faster & simpler but there is something about getting an actual letter or card through snailmail (perhaps the effort the sender put into it?) that you just don't get electronically.
I think I would go for E-mail...
Zaphod Posted Jul 24, 2002
Ya, you're right. The only big risk with e-mail is viruses and those are pretty easy to prevent. And nowadays you can get virsuses from snail mail, namely anthrax.
I think I would go for E-mail...
SallyM Posted Jul 24, 2002
Trouble is that I get so much spam that email is getting to the point of uselessness. I'll maybe get 1 useful email a day (usually the ACE chat group mail) and then have to delete 40 others. No I don't want a loan, to get my free prize or see Britany Spears naked.
In work our distribution centre/central lab is contacted more easily through email. That's the only thing which makes email worth it at the moment, the speed, and with snail mail in the uk getting slower it will have to become more widely used for commercial sectors.
I still get excited at getting a letter through snail mail, somebody has actually paid to send me this. I think this excitement will last until bills start to come in in force
SallyM
I think I would go for E-mail...
osiris- Posted Jul 24, 2002
I don't think virii are a big problem with e-mail. I've had things sent to me before that, had I ran or had my mail client ran, could have damaged my machine but it's only a case of deleting anything that looks suspect from addresses you don't recognise and, if you're using a version of Outlook, disabling all the fancy lets-run-everything-in-sight-regardless-of-what-it-might-be settings.
I use Mozilla Mail which has the ability to setup filters that you can use for things such as filtering out anything that looks remotely like spam from your mail as it arrives. The best way I've found to avoid unwanted rubbish arriving in your mailbox is to make a webmail account with hotmail or yahoo, or whoever, and use that when you signup to anything. Then keep your "proper" e-mail address seperate for personal mail.
I still couldn't say which I prefer between snailmail or email. It's nice to get a letter because you can see a person's gone to trouble to write you it but e-mail is infinitely quicker and also alot more secure, providing you have decent encryption setup.
I think I would go for E-mail...
Researcher 199160 Posted Jul 24, 2002
I use my hotmail for all my "public" mail so it gets all those lovely porn offers (Where do those come from?) and now with the .Mac fiasco I just use the email address provided by my ISP. (I can have up to 5)
I think I would go for E-mail...
Robert Posted Jul 25, 2002
My e-mail account recieves, miraculously, no junk e-mail. I recently switched from Hotmail because my hotmail address was getting filled with the stuff.
I encrypt as many of my messages as possible with PGP, therefore negating the security problem.
I never open any any unsolicitated attachments. I never, ever, open any executables or other high-risk attachments. I have never caught a virus, partly because I've always used Linux, and therefore can't be infected by them .
Personally, I prefer e-mail to snailmail. It costs less, I don't particularly care about the psycological aspects and it's quick and convenient.
Perhaps the only use I have for snail mail now is as a mail-order delivery system .
I think I would go for E-mail...
Researcher 199160 Posted Jul 25, 2002
Here in Canada most of the mail order stuff I get comes by Federal Express.
I use a mac so I've never even seen a virus.
I think I would go for E-mail...
osiris- Posted Jul 25, 2002
This might give you some idea ;]
http://www.cluelessmailers.org/spamdemic/mapfullsize3.html
I think I would go for E-mail...
Zaphod Posted Jul 25, 2002
Not being Britishh i wouldn't know how slow the mail system is, but ovefr hera in the good ol' U.S. of Ait takes about 2 days for mail to get from coast to coast. So E-mail definilty has that advantage, but spam is the scurge of my existense though i also hate junk mail. By the way could you forwrad me some of theose britney spears e-mails.
I think I would go for E-mail...
Zaphod Posted Jul 25, 2002
Hey mac boy, don't nock P.C.'s because you can write a virus that only works on macs
I think I would go for E-mail...
Zaphod Posted Jul 25, 2002
The porn mail comes form a complex system of comoputers known only as the beast.
I think I would go for E-mail...
Zaphod Posted Jul 25, 2002
really, i've always found low introductory offers to be very attractive.
I think I would go for E-mail...
Researcher PSG Posted Jul 25, 2002
I think e-mail is great, shame about the spam. But lets face it, we get a ton and a half of paper spam through the letter box, and at least e-mail spam doesn't destroy several major forests each year.
Researcher PSG
p.s. the effectiveness of UK mail seems to depend on where you live. I actually saw one place on watchdog that hasn't recieved any post for months.
Key: Complain about this post
I think I would go for E-mail...
- 1: Yoav Feuerstein - The Phantom (Jul 24, 2002)
- 2: Researcher 199160 (Jul 24, 2002)
- 3: Zaphod (Jul 24, 2002)
- 4: Researcher 199160 (Jul 24, 2002)
- 5: SallyM (Jul 24, 2002)
- 6: osiris- (Jul 24, 2002)
- 7: Researcher 199160 (Jul 24, 2002)
- 8: Robert (Jul 25, 2002)
- 9: Researcher 199160 (Jul 25, 2002)
- 10: osiris- (Jul 25, 2002)
- 11: Robert (Jul 25, 2002)
- 12: Zaphod (Jul 25, 2002)
- 13: Zaphod (Jul 25, 2002)
- 14: Robert (Jul 25, 2002)
- 15: Zaphod (Jul 25, 2002)
- 16: Zaphod (Jul 25, 2002)
- 17: Researcher 199160 (Jul 25, 2002)
- 18: Zaphod (Jul 25, 2002)
- 19: Researcher PSG (Jul 25, 2002)
- 20: Zaphod (Jul 27, 2002)
More Conversations for Talking Point: Snail Mail versus Email
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."