A Conversation for Discrepancies in the Theory of Evolution - Part I
The book analogy
Xanatic Started conversation Jun 19, 2002
I think the idea of comparing DNA to a book doesn't quite work here. You make it seem like there was some particular book that was to be made, some purpose. It would of course take a long time making Tom Sawyer by throwing together letters. But you don't need a finished book. Life started out very simple, and then moved on to complexity. To stay in the world of books, I doubt any author just spits out a book ready made. He starts out writing a skeleton, then adds different things here and there making it more complex. And sometimes deletes things that doesn't work, other times adding stuff.
The book analogy
Josh the Genius Posted Jun 21, 2002
True! But all this editing and prewriting is done by an author, an intelligent, guiding force, whereas evolution is purposeless.
The book analogy
Ste Posted Jun 24, 2002
Welcome back Josh.
Evolution is purposeless? Exactly. All it does is to elegantly describe *how* life came to be. It doesn't say why, no science does. So I'm afraid you're missing the point slightly.
Ste
Key: Complain about this post
The book analogy
More Conversations for Discrepancies in the Theory of Evolution - Part I
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."