h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

This is pseudoscientific claptrap to be honest. This reads like an advert for some dubious supplement. Candidal overgrowth has been covered in another article, and is been quite conclusively disproved by research. Is that sort of stuff suitable for a factual entry? There needs to be a balancing entry of the scientific evidence against surely - considering some of the articles I've seen deemed biased I'm very surprised this got into the guide.

It's probably in the Guide on the merit of the outstanding Subbing job... and the results of a thorough and exhaustive astrological check which pointed to a generally satisfactory response from hootoo readers, who would, in many cases, then meet tall handsome men sometime afterwards.